Literature DB >> 30731097

Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading.

J S Mansfield1, N Atilgan2, A M Lewis3, G E Legge2.   

Abstract

The MNREAD chart consists of standardized sentences printed at 19 sizes in 0.1 logMAR steps. There are 95 sentences distributed across the five English versions of the chart. However, there is a demand for a much larger number of sentences: for clinical research requiring repeated measures, and for new vision tests that use multiple trials at each print size. This paper describes a new sentence generator that has produced over nine million sentences that fit the MNREAD constraints, and demonstrates that reading performance with these new sentences is comparable to that obtained with the original MNREAD sentences. We measured reading performance with the original MNREAD sentences, two sets of our new sentences, and sentences with shuffled word order. Reading-speed versus print-size curves were obtained for each sentence set from 14 readers with normal vision at two levels of blur (intended to simulate acuity loss in low vision) and with unblurred text. We found no significant differences between the new and original sentences in reading acuity and critical print size across all levels of blur. Maximum reading speed was 7% slower with the new sentences than with the original sentences. Shuffled sentences yielded slower maximum reading speeds and larger reading acuities than the other sentences. Overall, measures of reading performance with the new sentences are similar to those obtained with the original MNREAD sentences. Our sentence generator substantially expands the reading materials for clinical research on reading vision using the MNREAD test, and opens up new possibilities for measuring how text parameters affect reading.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blur; Critical print size; MNREAD; Maximum reading speed; Reading acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30731097      PMCID: PMC6538455          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  The effect of contrast on reading speed in dyslexia.

Authors:  B A O'Brien; J S Mansfield; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A new sentence generator providing material for maximum reading speed measurement.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Perrin; Damien Paillé; Thierry Baccino
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

3.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  S T Chung; J S Mansfield; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  K Latham; D Whitaker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The role of context in reading with central field loss.

Authors:  E M Fine; E Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; I L Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Low-vision reading speed: influences of linguistic inference and aging.

Authors:  Sarah M Sass; Gordon E Legge; Hye-Won Lee
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Improvement in reading performance through training with simulated thalamic visual prostheses.

Authors:  Katerina Eleonora K Rassia; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The development of an automated sentence generator for the assessment of reading speed.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Gordon E Legge; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  7 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Web-Based Reading Test for Normal and Low Vision Patients.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Erald Duzha; Maria Tzinava; Asli Perente; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Konstantinos Delibasis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-22

2.  Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Eleftherios Chatzimichael; Maria Tzinava; Asimina Mataftsi; Konstantinos Delibasis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-22

3.  The impact of spectacle lenses for myopia control on visual functions.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Ee Woon Lim; Adeline Yang; Björn Drobe; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Scoring reading parameters: An inter-rater reliability study using the MNREAD chart.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Baskaran; Antonio Filipe Macedo; Yingchen He; Laura Hernandez-Moreno; Tatiana Queirós; J Stephen Mansfield; Aurélie Calabrèse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Repeatability and Validity of MNREAD Test in Children With Vision Impairment.

Authors:  Dawn K DeCarlo; Liyan Gao; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision.

Authors:  Katerina Eleonora K Rassia; Konstantinos Moutoussis; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Quan Lei; Aurélie Calabrèse; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.