Literature DB >> 8867490

One stage surgical management of deep infection of total hip arthroplasty.

D M Mulcahy1, J M O'Byrne, G E Fenelon.   

Abstract

Nineteen patients underwent one stage surgical management of infected hip prostheses over a five year period. Thirteen were male and six were female. The mean age was 64 years (Range 49-82). The mean time interval between primary and revision surgery was 26 months (Range 6 months-16 years). One stage re-implantation was performed in 15 patients and excision arthroplasty in 4 patients. The mean duration of follow up was 4 years, 5 months (Range 2-7 years). Patients were assessed, radiologically and clinically using the Harris hip score. Staph. aureus(7) and Slaph. epidermidis(10) were the most frequent organisms isolated. Patients who underwent excision arthroplasty had discharging sinuses, extensive soft tissue and bone involvement or were poor anaesthetic candidates. Three of these patients had a poor outcome in terms of pain function and deformity. Five of the patients who underwent one stage re-implantation had an excellent clinical result, seven had a good result, one had a fair result and one a poor result. There was no recurrence of infection in either group of patients. One stage re-implantation can result in a good clinical outcome and eradication of infection. Resection arthroplasty is a necessary option in a minority of patients, however, while successful in eradicating infection may result in a poor functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8867490     DOI: 10.1007/bf02942793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  13 in total

1.  Antibiotic resistance of biomaterial-adherent coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive staphylococci.

Authors:  P T Naylor; Q N Myrvik; A Gristina
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection.

Authors:  D J McDonald; R H Fitzgerald; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Diagnosis of infection and the role of permanent excision arthroplasty.

Authors:  D L Hamblen
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  One-stage revision of infected total hip replacements with discharging sinuses.

Authors:  V V Raut; P D Siney; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-09

6.  Biomechanical assessment of patients treated by joint surgery.

Authors:  T R Brown; J P Paul; I G Kelly; D L Hamblen
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1981-10

7.  Antibiotics and bone cements. Experimental and clinical long-term observations.

Authors:  H Wahlig; E Dingeldein
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-02

8.  Reimplantation in infection: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  E A Salvati; K M Chekofsky; B D Brause; P D Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Girdlestone arthroplasty for infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E S Bittar; W Petty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Management of deep infection of total hip replacement.

Authors:  H W Buchholz; R A Elson; E Engelbrecht; H Lodenkämper; J Röttger; A Siegel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

2.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Staged custom, intramedullary antibiotic spacers for severe segmental bone loss in infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Okechukwu Anakwenze; Gwo-Chin Lee; Charles L Nelson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 5.  Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review.

Authors:  D A George; N Logoluso; G Castellini; S Gianola; S Scarponi; F S Haddad; L Drago; C L Romano
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  Systematic review of single stage revision for prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Zachary C Lum; Christopher Thomas Holland; John P Meehan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.