Literature DB >> 7127966

Reimplantation in infection: a 12-year experience.

E A Salvati, K M Chekofsky, B D Brause, P D Wilson.   

Abstract

Three groups of patients underwent reimplantation for infected hip prostheses during the period from 1968 to 1979. The first group (N = 19) was diagnosed mainly by hip aspiration and treated with antibiotics selected by disc sensitivity and one-stage reimplantation in 14 hips. The second group (N = 26) was diagnosed by strict hip infection criteria and treated with a similar antibiotic regimen. Reimplantation was performed in one stage in 13 patients and in two stages in the remaining 13. The third group (N = 16) was diagnosed by the same criteria but treated with standardized bactericidal antibiotics evaluated by the tube dilution method. There were five one-stage reimplantations, ten two-stage, and one radical debridement without removal of components. The follow-up period ranged from two to 12 years. The present guidelines for reimplantation include subacute hip sepsis caused by susceptible bacteria, according to tube dilution methods in immunocompetent patients with adequate soft tissue and bone stock to allow a satisfactory biomechanical reconstruction. Patients should be aware of the risk of recurrence of infection, persistent pain, limited durability, and further surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7127966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  [One stage revision of infected total hip replacements with replacement of bone loss by allografts. Study of 90 cases of which 46 used bone allografts].

Authors:  B Loty; M Postel; J Evrard; P Matron; J P Courpied; M Kerboull; B Tomeno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone and joint infections.

Authors:  T Louie
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03

3.  Reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity.

Authors:  R J Claridge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Brucellar prosthetic arthritis in a total knee replacement.

Authors:  A Ortí; P Roig; R Alcalá; V Navarro; M Salavert; C Martín; A Zorraquino; J Merino
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Infection management in total hip replacement.

Authors:  A Härle
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  The effect of endoskeleton on antibiotic impregnated cement spacer for treating deep hip infection.

Authors:  Kuo-Ti Peng; Liang-Tseng Kuo; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Yao-Hung Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  [Replacement of infected total hip prosthesis in two stages].

Authors:  E Lenoble; D Goutallier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  One stage surgical management of deep infection of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D M Mulcahy; J M O'Byrne; G E Fenelon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Brucella infection in total knee arthroplasty. Case report and revision of the literature.

Authors:  Enrico Tassinari; Daniele Di Motta; Federico Giardina; Francesco Traina; Marcello De Fine; Aldo Toni
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-03-27

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.