Literature DB >> 8865632

A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids.

R A Dobie1, M J Wilson.   

Abstract

Sinusoids in background noise can conveniently be detected using unsegmented power spectra, comparing power at the signal frequency to average power at several neighbor frequencies. In this case, the F test is preferable to t tests based on rms or dB values, because of the skewed distributions of rms and dB when signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) = 0. F-test performance improves as the number of frequencies increases, to about 15, but can be degraded if the background noise is not white, with a slope exceeding about 10 dB for the range of frequencies sampled. Segment analysis, using magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) or related statistics, has equivalent statistical power; MSC and F each yield unbiased SNR estimates that have identical distributions when SNR = 0. Selection of F or MSC for detection of sinusoids will usually be a matter of convenience.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865632     DOI: 10.1121/1.417933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Coherence between one random and one periodic signal for measuring the strength of responses in the electro-encephalogram during sensory stimulation.

Authors:  de Sá A M F L Miranda; A F C Infantosi; D M Simpson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Concurrent Acoustic Activation of the Medial Olivocochlear System Modifies the After-Effects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on the Human Inner Ear.

Authors:  Kathrin Kugler; Lutz Wiegrebe; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-12

4.  Modulation rate transfer functions in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with normal hearing and high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  James J Finneran; Hollis R London; Dorian S Houser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

6.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Aftereffects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Effect of Frequency and Level.

Authors:  Lena Jeanson; Lutz Wiegrebe; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-19

9.  Hearing loss in stranded odontocete dolphins and whales.

Authors:  David Mann; Mandy Hill-Cook; Charles Manire; Danielle Greenhow; Eric Montie; Jessica Powell; Randall Wells; Gordon Bauer; Petra Cunningham-Smith; Robert Lingenfelser; Robert DiGiovanni; Abigale Stone; Micah Brodsky; Robert Stevens; George Kieffer; Paul Hoetjes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.