Literature DB >> 8863109

Comparison of four methods of automated recording of physiologic data at one minute intervals.

P Gregorini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate possible differences between the maximum, minimum, and mean value over each epoch, or the instantaneous value at the end of the interval, when recording physiological data at 1-minute intervals.
METHODS: The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate derived from the radial pulse (PULSE), end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), and the arterial O2 saturation by pulse oximeter (SpO2) were measured continuously in 10 patients during general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using the same technique for the first 10 minutes. At 1-minute intervals for each parameter, the maximum, minimum, and mean value (over the preceding minute), as well as the instantaneous value at the end of the recording epoch, were automatically downloaded to an electronic spreadsheet. The differences between the maximum and minimum, the maximum and mean, the mean and minimum, and the instantaneous and mean values were calculated for each patient.
RESULTS: We found differences between the maximum and minimum values recorded over each interval, between the maximum and mean values, between the mean and minimum values, and between the mean and instantaneous values recorded at the end of each minute interval for all physiological parameters examined.
CONCLUSIONS: From the data presented, we conclude that during the first 10 minutes of a general anesthetic, including anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation, the values of physiologic parameters derived from different summary indices, namely the maximum, minimum, and mean values over the 1-minute interval or instantaneous at the end of the interval differ from each other. This source of error must be considered when designing systems for computerized recordkeeping of anesthesia charts and when interpreting the data stored in electronic databases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8863109     DOI: 10.1007/bf02221750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  6 in total

1.  Automated real-time data acquisition and analysis of cardiorespiratory function.

Authors:  R C Moorman; C F Mackenzie; G H Ho; G M Barnas; P D Wilson; M J Matjasko
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1991

2.  Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: a quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia records.

Authors:  J G Lerou; R Dirksen; M van Daele; G M Nijhuis; J F Crul
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-01

3.  Sampling intervals for clinical monitoring of variables during anesthesia.

Authors:  J S Gravenstein; A de Vries; J E Beneken
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1989-01

4.  What is heart rate, anyway?

Authors:  F E Block
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-11

5.  Automated anesthesia surgery medical record system.

Authors:  J S Gage; S Subramanian; J F Dydro; P J Poppers
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1990

6.  Timing of peak pressor response following endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  S Hickey; A E Cameron; A J Asbury; G D Murray
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.105

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of vital signs charted by nurses with automated acquired values using waveform quality indices.

Authors:  Monica Sapo; Shaozhi Wu; Shadnaz Asgari; Norma McNair; Farzad Buxey; Neil Martin; Xiao Hu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The incidence of hypoxemia during surgery: evidence from two institutions.

Authors:  Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Luke M Funk; Johan Van Schalkwyk; Alan F Merry; Warren S Sandberg; Atul Gawande
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Adequate interval for the monitoring of vital signs during endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  J Y Min; H I Kim; S J Park; H Lim; J H Song; H J Byon
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.