Literature DB >> 886281

Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli.

G Berlucchi, F Crea, M Di Stefano, G Tassinari.   

Abstract

In a simple reaction time task, key-pressing responses to unpatterned light stimuli presented in the right and left visual fields were faster for the hand ipsilateral to the visual stimulus than for the hand contralateral to the stimulus. The superiority of the ipsilateral reactions was seen also when responses were made with the hands crossed, so that such a superiority cannot be attributed to spatial compatibility between the side of the stimulus and the position of the response device. Similar results were obtained in a reaction time task of the Donders's c-type. It is argued that these laterality effects in visuomotor reaction time tasks are best explained by the anatomical relationships between the visual fields, the cerebral hemispheres, and the hands. The possible interaction between these effects and the effects of spatial compatibility between side of stimulus and side of response device are discussed in relation to reaction time tasks of the Donder's b-type.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 886281     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.3.3.505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Intentional pre-cueing does not influence the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ivonne Buhlmann; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-01-25

3.  The role of task history in simple reaction time to lateralized light flashes.

Authors:  Eric Mooshagian; Marco Iacoboni; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Dana Müller; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli.

Authors:  C M Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions.

Authors:  G Heister; W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

10.  Hemispheric control of unilateral and bilateral responses to lateralized light stimuli after callosotomy and in callosal agenesis.

Authors:  S Aglioti; G Berlucchi; R Pallini; G F Rossi; G Tassinari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.