BACKGROUND: A 2-test approach for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease has recently been proposed. A positive or equivocal result on a first-stage test (eg, an enzyme immunoassay) is followed by a Western immunoblot test. For a sample to be considered seropositive for Lyme disease, the immunoblot result must be positive. OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of IgM immunoblotting for detection of early Lyme disease and to establish interpretative criteria for a commercially available immunoblot assay. METHODS: Serum samples from 44 patients with erythema migrans were tested by an IgM immunoblot assay. All patients were culture-positive for Borrelia burgdorferi. Serum samples from 2 different control groups were also tested. Interpretative criteria were developed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The presence of any 2 IgM bands was found to be the optimal criterion for a positive test result, and in patients with illness of less than 7 days' duration, this was significantly more sensitive than the criterion of any 2 of the 3 specific bands defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors Lyme Disease Workgroup (P < .05). Specificity of the criterion of any 2 bands was 100% for 1 group of controls but only 96% for the more clinically relevant control group; this small difference had a large impact on the positive predictive value in populations at low risk for Lyme disease. CONCLUSIONS: Using a commercially available immunoblot test kit, the presence of any 2 IgM bands is proposed as a positive result. The predictive value of a positive IgM immunoblot result, however, is poor in patients with minimal clinical evidence for Lyme disease.
BACKGROUND: A 2-test approach for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease has recently been proposed. A positive or equivocal result on a first-stage test (eg, an enzyme immunoassay) is followed by a Western immunoblot test. For a sample to be considered seropositive for Lyme disease, the immunoblot result must be positive. OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of IgM immunoblotting for detection of early Lyme disease and to establish interpretative criteria for a commercially available immunoblot assay. METHODS: Serum samples from 44 patients with erythema migrans were tested by an IgM immunoblot assay. All patients were culture-positive for Borrelia burgdorferi. Serum samples from 2 different control groups were also tested. Interpretative criteria were developed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The presence of any 2 IgM bands was found to be the optimal criterion for a positive test result, and in patients with illness of less than 7 days' duration, this was significantly more sensitive than the criterion of any 2 of the 3 specific bands defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors Lyme Disease Workgroup (P < .05). Specificity of the criterion of any 2 bands was 100% for 1 group of controls but only 96% for the more clinically relevant control group; this small difference had a large impact on the positive predictive value in populations at low risk for Lyme disease. CONCLUSIONS: Using a commercially available immunoblot test kit, the presence of any 2 IgM bands is proposed as a positive result. The predictive value of a positive IgM immunoblot result, however, is poor in patients with minimal clinical evidence for Lyme disease.
Authors: M E Aguero-Rosenfeld; J Roberge; C A Carbonaro; J Nowakowski; R B Nadelman; G P Wormser Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Lise E Nigrovic; Jonathan E Bennett; Fran Balamuth; Michael N Levas; Rachel L Chenard; Alexandra B Maulden; Aris C Garro Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Claudia R Molins; Christopher Sexton; John W Young; Laura V Ashton; Ryan Pappert; Charles B Beard; Martin E Schriefer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Arianna H Dart; Kenneth A Michelson; Paul L Aronson; Aris C Garro; Thomas J Lee; Kimberly M Glerum; Peter A Nigrovic; Mininder S Kocher; Richard G Bachur; Lise E Nigrovic Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Steven M Callister; Dean A Jobe; William A Agger; Ronald F Schell; Todd J Kowalski; Steven D Lovrich; Jennifer A Marks Journal: Clin Diagn Lab Immunol Date: 2002-07