Literature DB >> 9542940

Immunoglobulin M capture assay for serologic confirmation of early Lyme disease: analysis of immune complexes with biotinylated Borrelia burgdorferi sonicate enhanced with flagellin peptide epitope.

M Brunner1, S Stein, P D Mitchell, L H Sigal.   

Abstract

We previously reported on the efficacy of the enzyme-linked immunoglobulin M capture immune complex (IC) biotinylated antigen assay (EMIBA) for the seroconfirmation of early Lyme disease and active infection with Borrelia burgdorferi. In earlier work we identified non-cross-reacting epitopes of a number of B. burgdorferi proteins, including flagellin. We now report on an improvement in the performance of EMIBA with the addition of a biotinylated form of a synthetic non-cross-reacting immunodominant flagellin peptide to the biotinylated B. burgdorferi B31 sonicate antigen source with the avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex detection system used in our recently developed indirect IgM-capture immune complex-based assay (EMIBA). As in our previous studies, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reactivities of antibodies liberated from circulating ICs (by EMIBA) were compared with those of antibodies in unprocessed serum (antibodies found free in the serum, thus as an IgM-capture ELISA, but not EMIBA, because the antibodies were not liberated from ICs), the sample usually used in standard ELISAs and Western blot assays. The addition of the flagellin epitope enhanced the ELISA signal obtained with untreated sera from many Lyme disease patients but not from healthy controls. In tests with both free antibodies and ICs, with or without the addition of the flagellin epitope to the sonicate, we found the most advantageous combination was IC as the source of antibodies and sonicate plus the flagellin epitope as the antigen. In a blinded study of sera obtained from patients with early and later-phase Lyme disease, EMIBA with the enhanced antigenic preparation compared favorably with other serologic assays, especially for the confirmation of early disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9542940      PMCID: PMC104692          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.1074-1080.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  54 in total

1.  Serodiagnosis of Lyme disease: accuracy of a two-step approach using a flagella-based ELISA and immunoblotting.

Authors:  B J Johnson; K E Robbins; R E Bailey; B L Cao; S L Sviat; R B Craven; L W Mayer; D T Dennis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Measurement of antibodies to the Borrelia burgdorferi flagellum improves serodiagnosis in Lyme disease.

Authors:  K Hansen; P Hindersson; N S Pedersen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease.

Authors:  A C Steere; R L Grodzicki; A N Kornblatt; J E Craft; A G Barbour; W Burgdorfer; G P Schmid; E Johnson; S E Malawista
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of methods for quantitating antigen-specific immunoglobulin M antibody with a reverse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  J P Siegel; J S Remington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rheumatoid factor in syphilis.

Authors:  E H Cerny; C E Farshy; E F Hunter; S A Larsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. Appearance of a new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G response late in the illness.

Authors:  J E Craft; D K Fischer; G T Shimamoto; A C Steere
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  On the secretion of H-Y antigen.

Authors:  M Brunner; C A Moreira-Filho; G Wachtel; S Wachtel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Isolation of antigenic components from the Lyme disease spirochete: their role in early diagnosis.

Authors:  J L Coleman; J L Benach
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Cross-reactivity in serological tests for Lyme disease and other spirochetal infections.

Authors:  L A Magnarelli; J F Anderson; R C Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes.

Authors:  A G Barbour
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug
View more
  3 in total

1.  Report refuting value of immune complexes to diagnose Lyme disease is invalid.

Authors:  Michael Brunner
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-02

2.  Detection of immune complexes is not independent of detection of antibodies in Lyme disease patients and does not confirm active infection with Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Adriana R Marques; Ronald L Hornung; Len Dally; Mario T Philipp
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-09

3.  Use of serum immune complexes in a new test that accurately confirms early Lyme disease and active infection with Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  M Brunner; L H Sigal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.