Literature DB >> 8861169

Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues.

R Kemp1, G Pike, P White, A Musselman.   

Abstract

A face is surprisingly difficult to recognise when presented in photographic negative, and negation has also been shown to affect simple perceptual judgments about a face. Two possible explanations for this effect are examined. In the shape-from-shading explanation it is argued that negating an image results in an impossible pattern of shading, and that this disrupts the formation of a three-dimensional representation of the surface geometry of the face. In an alternative account for this effect it is suggested that identification errors occur as a consequence of changes to the apparent pigmentation of the face caused by negating the image. Three experiments are reported which are designed to test these explanations by using novel colour-image transformations in which the hue and luminance components of images are independently manipulated. The results of these studies suggest that although changes to the apparent pigmentation of a face might result in identification errors in some situations, the loss of shape-from-shading cues is a more important cause of the negation effect. The role of these two sources of information in the recognition of normal faces is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8861169     DOI: 10.1068/p250037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  24 in total

1.  The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces.

Authors:  K Lander; F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Feature-based face representations and image reconstruction from behavioral and neural data.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; David C Plaut; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding.

Authors:  Sharon Gilad; Ming Meng; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Attentive texture similarity as a categorization task: Comparing texture synthesis models.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 7.740

Review 6.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

7.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Role of fusiform and anterior temporal cortical areas in facial recognition.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Face Processing Systems: From Neurons to Real-World Social Perception.

Authors:  Winrich Freiwald; Bradley Duchaine; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.