Literature DB >> 27592121

Sequential designs for individualized dosing in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Xuezhou Mao1, Ying Kuen Cheung2.   

Abstract

This paper addresses dose finding in clinical trials where individuals exhibit biologic characteristics that alter the toxicity risks of the individuals. In these situations, instead of determining a dose that works for every patient, the trial aims to identify a dosing algorithm that prescribes dose according to the patient's biomarker or pharmacokinetic expression. Specifically, we aim to dose patients around a pre-specified level of area under the curve of irinotecan concentration using the patients' baseline phenotypes that predict drug clearance. We propose least squares recursion procedures to estimate the dosing algorithm sequentially with an aim to treat patients in the trial around the true unknown dosing algorithm, and introduce a novel application of an eigenvalue theory that guarantees convergence to the true dosing algorithms. Our simulation study demonstrates that using an eigenvalue constraint improves the efficiency of the recursion by as large as 40%, while concentrating in-trial patient allocation around the true dosing algorithm. We also provide practical guidance on design calibration, and design future irinotecan studies based on data from our first trial.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive design; Coherence; Eigenvalue constraint; Least squares recursion; Pharmacokinetic variability.; Precision medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592121      PMCID: PMC5332400          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  15 in total

1.  On the use of nonparametric curves in phase I trials with low toxicity tolerance.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics by use of cytochrome P450 3A4 phenotyping probes.

Authors:  Ron H J Mathijssen; Floris A de Jong; Ron H N van Schaik; Erin R Lepper; Lena E Friberg; Trinet Rietveld; Peter de Bruijn; Wilfried J Graveland; William D Figg; Jaap Verweij; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Kai Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Patient-specific dose finding based on bivariate outcomes and covariates.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

8.  Risk-group-specific dose finding based on an average toxicity score.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Individualizing dosing of irinotecan.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A CYP3A4 phenotype-based dosing algorithm for individualized treatment of irinotecan.

Authors:  Jessica M van der Bol; Ron H J Mathijssen; Geert-Jan M Creemers; André S Th Planting; Walter J Loos; Erik A C Wiemer; Lena E Friberg; Jaap Verweij; Alex Sparreboom; Floris A de Jong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.