Literature DB >> 22993587

Usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in breast-conserving surgery.

Kazuhiro Sumiyoshi1, Takehiro Nohara, Mitsuhiko Iwamoto, Satoru Tanaka, Kosei Kimura, Yuko Takahashi, Yoshitaka Kurisu, Motomu Tsuji, Nobuhiko Tanigawa.   

Abstract

In breast-conserving surgery, positive margins are closely related to intramammary recurrence, but methods of assessing resection stumps during breast-conserving surgery have not been standardized. The present study investigated the usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in our department. From 2005 to 2008, a total of 420 patients underwent breast cancer surgery. Subjects comprised 160 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and touch smear cytology. Results of the touch smear cytology were compared to those of the histological tissue analysis. Touch smear cytology displayed 70% sensitivity (14/20), 97.1% specificity (136/140) and a diagnostic accuracy of 93.8% (150/160). Six false-negative cases and 4 false-positive cases were identified. Of the 6 false-negatives, cancer cells were noted in the ductal component in 5 cases, and the degree of cancer cell atypia in the stump was low. Residual cancer cells were noted in the stump in 18 cases, and additional resection was performed in 16 cases. Cancer cells were identified histologically in the additionally resected tissue in 8 of these 16 cases (50%). The direction of positive cytology was towards the nipple in 16 cases, lateral tissue in 5 cases and contralateral nipple in 2 cases. A greater cancer cell volume, as assessed by touch smear cytology, tended to be associated with higher frequency of positive margins, as assessed by histological tissue analysis. Touch smear cytology is easy to perform, offering a very useful technique yielding comparable results to histological tissue analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22993587      PMCID: PMC3445955          DOI: 10.3892/etm_00000100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  11 in total

1.  Rapid Intraoperative Scrape Cytology Assessment of Surgical Margins in Breast Conservation Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1998-04-25       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.

Authors:  C E Cox; N N Ku; D S Reintgen; H M Greenberg; S V Nicosia; S Wangensteen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-04

3.  Trends in breast-conserving surgery in Connecticut: no effect of negative publicity.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1996-09

4.  Why are local recurrences after breast-conserving therapy more frequent in younger patients?

Authors:  J M Kurtz; J Jacquemier; R Amalric; H Brandone; Y Ayme; D Hans; C Bressac; J M Spitalier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence.

Authors:  C C Park; M Mitsumori; A Nixon; A Recht; J Connolly; R Gelman; B Silver; S Hetelekidis; A Abner; J R Harris; S J Schnitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  M S Anscher; P Jones; L R Prosnitz; W Blackstock; M Hebert; R Reddick; A Tucker; R Dodge; G Leight; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; D L Covington; R Rutledge; M P Churchill; A A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Comparison of breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy for treatment of early breast cancer in community hospitals.

Authors:  A C Voogd; H W Nab; M A Crommelin; L H van der Heijden; H M Kluck; J W Coebergh
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Relationship of tumor grade to other pathologic features and to treatment outcome of patients with early stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  A J Nixon; S J Schnitt; R Gelman; I Gage; B Bornstein; S Hetelekidis; A Recht; B Silver; J R Harris; J L Connolly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Simple and Rapid Method to Obtain High-quality Tumor DNA from Clinical-pathological Specimens Using Touch Imprint Cytology.

Authors:  Kenji Amemiya; Yosuke Hirotsu; Toshio Oyama; Masao Omata
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Touch imprint cytology with massively parallel sequencing (TIC-seq): a simple and rapid method to snapshot genetic alterations in tumors.

Authors:  Kenji Amemiya; Yosuke Hirotsu; Taichiro Goto; Hiroshi Nakagomi; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshio Oyama; Masao Omata
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  A survey of current surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer in China.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2018-08-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.