Literature DB >> 8852567

Radial cortical and trabecular bone densities of men and women standardized with the European Forearm Phantom.

J Reeve1, H Kröger, J Nijs, J Pearson, D Felsenberg, C Reiners, P Schneider, A Mitchell, P Ruegsegger, C Zander, M Fischer, J Bright, M Henley, M Lunt, J Dequeker.   

Abstract

We previously showed that it is possible to cross-calibrate peripheral bone densitometers using the European Spine Phantom (ESP). We have now performed a multinational study of cross-calibrated radius bone density based on normal subjects of both sexes in eight European centers. Six centers were equipped with machines made by Scanco or Stratec for determining distal radial trabecular bone density by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and two were equipped with Lunar SP2 single photon absorptiometry (SPA) equipment for measuring midshaft cortical bone density. Subjects recruited ranged from 20 to over 80 years of age. Over one hundred and fifteen men were studied by QCT and a different cohort of 104 men were studied with SPA; the equivalent figures for women were 235 and 123. Reference ranges were derived for bone density against age for each of the four groups, and their applicability is discussed in relation to between-center differences in the results obtained. There were insignificant differences (P > 0.05 with Bonferroni correction) between centers in the values obtained by QCT in the different populations. However, there were considerably larger and highly statistically significant differences between midshaft cortical bone density values of about 10% of overall means between subjects from eastern Finland and central Belgium (P < 0.001), with higher Finnish values. Women had considerably lower radial trabecular bone density values than men at all ages, a result that differentiates the radius from the spine. This sex difference widened after menopause. These results have important implications for understanding the contribution of bone density to the differential risk of Colles' fracture in the two sexes and suggest that further work is needed to establish young normal reference ranges for radial bone density in Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8852567     DOI: 10.1007/bf02526878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  23 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The utility of single-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R M Neer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Age and sex influences on fall characteristics.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; J Varlow; A J Silman; J Reeve; D M Reid; C Todd; A D Woolf
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability.

Authors:  J Pearson; P Ruegsegger; J Dequeker; M Henley; J Bright; J Reeve; W Kalender; D Felsenberg; A M Laval-Jeantet; J E Adams
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1994-11

6.  Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density.

Authors:  E A Krall; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.

Authors:  M Wapniarz; R Lehmann; O Randerath; S Baedeker; W John; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardized with the European Spine Phantom.

Authors:  J Pearson; J Dequeker; J Reeve; D Felsenberg; M Henley; J Bright; M Lunt; J Adams; M Diaz Curiel; F Galan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Tobias Roth; Martin Gschwentner; Armin Suckert; Michael Blauth; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Strut Onlay Allograft in Revision Arthroplasty: Osseous Union and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Dietmar Dammerer; Alexander Wurm; Clemens Frischhut; Johannes Petersen; Miar Ouaret; Michael Liebensteiner
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Radiographic and clinical outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with bone allograft.

Authors:  Sarah Meiser; Rohit Arora; Johannes Petersen; Alexander Keiler; Michael C Liebensteiner; Johannes Dominikus Pallua; Alexander Wurm
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Cetaceans Humerus Radiodensity by CT: A Useful Technique Differentiating between Species, Ecophysiology, and Age.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Achille Consoli; Yara Bernaldo de Quirós; Manuel Arbelo; Stefania Fulle; Marco Marchisio; Mario Encinoso; Antonio Fernandez; Miguel A Rivero
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.