Literature DB >> 8845604

Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss.

S Adami1, N Zamberlan, D Gatti, C Zanfisi, V Braga, M Broggini, M Rossini.   

Abstract

The best method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk is currently considered to be bone densitometry. The most commonly used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods may sometimes not predict bone mass accurately in every skeletal site, are expensive and not widely available. The recent development of computed analysis of a plain radiograph of the hand might provide a practical, inexpensive and rapid method for evaluation of bone mineral status. In this study we evaluated 20 healthy premenopausal and 660 postmenopausal women. In 36 of these subjects a second evaluation was carried out after 2 years of therapy with calcium supplements. The internal and external diameters of the second metacarpal and the metacarpal and ultradistal radial bone density were evaluated using a technical device developed in our laboratory and marketed by NIM, Verona, Italy (Osteoradiometer). The radiographic images, captured by a video camera, were digitized and studied by computed analysis. In 150 subjects bone density at the level of the lumbar spine, femur, and ultradistal and proximal radius was also measured by DXA techniques. Both external (D) and internal (d) diameters increase significantly with age and years since menopause (YSM), whereas metacarpal index (D--d/D) and metacarpal and ultradistal radial bone density decrease significantly with age and YSM. The ratio between metacarpal bone mineral content and the cortical area (volumetric metacarpal bone density) did not change with age. Significant correlations were found between radiometric findings and DXA measurements. The best correlation coefficients were between bone density measured at the level of the ultradistal radius by DXA and radiographic absorptiometry. In the 2-year follow-up study, a 4.9% and 6.2% decline in radial metacarpal bone density respectively were observed, but the difference was statistically significant only for the latter. In conclusion, computed radiogrammetry is closely correlated with all DXA measurements and may be useful in screening of large populations, providing a simple, inexpensive and sufficiently precise method for evaluation of bone mineral status. Further studies are warranted for assessing the accuracy of radiogrammetry for longitudinal investigations and its capacity to predict fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845604     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  Clinical use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The measurement of sequential changes in cortical bone geometry.

Authors:  A Horsman; M Simpson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Radiographic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass.

Authors:  F Cosman; B Herrington; S Himmelstein; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diagnostic evaluation of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Eastell; B L Riggs
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.741

6.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Ultrasonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured?

Authors:  C G Miller; R J Herd; T Ramalingam; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and accuracy study.

Authors:  S O Yang; S Hagiwara; K Engelke; M S Dhillon; G Guglielmi; E J Bendavid; O Soejima; D L Nelson; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Advantages of peripheral radiogrametry over dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  H E Meema; H Meindok
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  14 in total

1.  Potential clinical relevance of digital radiogrammetry for quantification of periarticular bone demineralization in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis depending on severity and compared with DXA.

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Malich; A Pfeil; A Petrovitch; G Lehmann; J P Heyne; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of aging on trabecular and compact bone components of proximal and ultradistal radius.

Authors:  D Gatti; M Rossini; N Zamberlan; V Braga; E Fracassi; S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Shorter unipedal standing time and lower bone mineral density in women with distal radius fractures.

Authors:  A Sakai; T Oshige; Y Zenke; Y Yamanaka; H Otsuka; T Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Identification of homogeneous genetic architecture of multiple genetically correlated traits by block clustering of genome-wide associations.

Authors:  Mayetri Gupta; Ching-Lung Cheung; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Serkalem Demissie; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; David Karasik
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Evaluation of cortical thickness and bone density by roentgen microdensitometry in growing males and females.

Authors:  N Zamberlan; G Radetti; C Paganini; D Gatti; M Rossini; V Braga; S Adami
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Radiographic absorptiometry for measuring bone mass.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Age-related changes in cortical bone mass: data from a German female cohort.

Authors:  V A Molina Toledo; M Jergas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  [Clinical trial for differentiation between corticoid-induced osteoporosis and periarticular demineralization via digital radiogrammetry in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  J Böttcher; A Pfeil; G Lehmann; B Heinrich; A Malich; A Hansch; A Petrovitch; H-J Mentzel; G Hein; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Prematurity and low birth weight lead to altered bone geometry, strength, and quality in children.

Authors:  S Longhi; F Mercolini; L Carloni; L Nguyen; A Fanolla; G Radetti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.