Literature DB >> 8422514

Ultrasonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: which velocity should be measured?

C G Miller1, R J Herd, T Ramalingam, I Fogelman, G M Blake.   

Abstract

The assessment of skeletal integrity by the measurement of ultrasonic velocity through the calcaneus has only recently become widely available and is usually made in conjunction with the measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation. Using data obtained with a contact ultrasonic bone analyser (CUBA) system, this report examines whether ultrasonic studies of the heel require the measurement of true velocity of sound in the calcaneus (Vbone), or whether heel velocity (Vheel, defined as the mean velocity through bone and soft tissue) or time of flight velocity (Vtof, defined as the mean velocity between the two transducers) are adequate surrogates. The populations selected for study were 15 healthy young women (group 1, mean age 26 years), 231 healthy peri- and postmenopausal women (group 2, mean age 52 years) and 33 osteoporotic women with confirmed vertebral fracture (group 3, mean age 66 years). Precision was studied by performing 10 repeated scans on the subjects in group 1 and duplicate scans on 144 women randomly selected in groups 2 and 3. Precision was expressed as the percentage coefficient of variation (CV). Both precision studies yielded similar results. The precisions (and 5% to 95% ranges) for all groups combined were: Vbone 2.71% (1465-1809 m/s); Vheel, 1.10% (1511-1646 m/s): Vtof, 0.70% (1349-1425 m/s). Although the precision data suggest Vtof should be preferred, when the range of clinical values is taken into account the smaller CV is exactly cancelled by the narrower range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8422514     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  3 in total

1.  A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone.

Authors:  C M Langton; A V Ali; C M Riggs; G P Evans; W Bonfield
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1990-08

2.  Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of the radius, femur and lumbar spine.

Authors:  P Rossman; J Zagzebski; C Mesina; J Sorenson; R Mazess
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1989-11

Review 3.  Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues.

Authors:  S A Goss; R L Johnston; F Dunn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total
  26 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?

Authors:  Masako Ito; Akifumi Nishida; Jun Kono; Mika Kono; Masataka Uetani; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanxes of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Ventura; M Mauloni; M Mura; F Paltrinieri; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Longitudinal changes in ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus.

Authors:  P L van Daele; H Burger; C E De Laet; A Hofman; D E Grobbee; J C Birkenhäger; H A Pols
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location.

Authors:  K Brooke-Wavell; P R Jones; D W Pye
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  S Adami; N Zamberlan; D Gatti; C Zanfisi; V Braga; M Broggini; M Rossini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus using an automatic region of interest.

Authors:  B Fournier; C Chappard; C Roux; G Berger; P Laugier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A technical and clinical evaluation of digital X-ray radiogrammetry.

Authors:  K A Ward; J Cotton; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity.

Authors:  J M Orgee; H Foster; E V McCloskey; S Khan; G Coombes; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.