Literature DB >> 8844000

Evaluating patient's knowledge of maternal serum screening.

V Goel1, R Glazier, S Holzapfel, P Pugh, A Summers.   

Abstract

The objective was to describe the development, characteristics, and initial use of an instrument for assessing knowledge about maternal serum screening (MSS). Items for a knowledge scale were selected based on a review of educational materials, the literature, and expert opinion. Items were pre-tested for comprehensibility and ambiguity in a convenience sample. After extensive pre-testing and pilot testing a 14-item scale, the Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire (MSSKQ) was developed. It was administered to 1084 women attending a maternal registration clinic. The overall knowledge score was compared across socio-demographic groups, and by sources of information about MSS. Mean MSSKQ scores increased with age, education, and family income, and among those reporting having an opportunity to discuss MSS and receiving written material. The MSSKQ is a reliable instrument with good content and construct validity. This tool should be valuable in assessing knowledge and level of informed consent in women receiving MSS and in evaluating the implementation of MSS programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844000     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199605)16:5<425::AID-PD874>3.0.CO;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Patients' Knowledge of Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21.

Authors:  Michal Sheinis; Kira Bensimon; Amanda Selk
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  E R Drake; L Engler-Todd; A M O'Connor; L C Surh; A Hunter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Assessment of the Effectiveness of Genetic Counseling by Telephone Compared to a Clinic Visit.

Authors:  Karan K Sangha; Anita Dircks; Sylvie Langlois
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Women's experience of maternal serum screening.

Authors:  J C Carroll; J B Brown; A J Reid; P Pugh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Psychological outcomes following maternal serum screening: a cohort study.

Authors:  V Goel; R Glazier; A Summers; S Holzapfel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result.

Authors:  Julie L Piechan; Karrie A Hines; Daniel L Koller; Kristyne Stone; Kimberly Quaid; Wilfredo Torres-Martinez; Divya Wilson Mathews; Tatiana Foroud; Lola Cook
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Sherri Pena; Judith T Bishop; Sanae Nakagawa; Steven E Gregorich; Anita Sit; Juan Vargas; Aaron B Caughey; Susan Sykes; Lasha Pierce; Mary E Norton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Women's knowledge of prenatal ultrasound and informed choice.

Authors:  Ruth J Kohut; Deborah Dewey; Edgar J Love
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.