Literature DB >> 8841156

Cost-effectiveness analysis of serum vancomycin concentration monitoring in patients with hematologic malignancies.

M D Fernández de Gatta1, M V Calvo, J M Hernández, D Caballero, J F San Miguel, A Domínguez-Gil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring in patients with hematologic malignancies.
METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. Seventy immunocompromised febrile patients with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to either a vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring group (TDM group; n = 37) or to a control group (n = 33). Intervention in the TDM group involved patient follow-up by a clinical pharmacist to obtain and pharmacokinetically interpret serum vancomycin concentrations for dosage individualization.
RESULTS: Evaluation of all patients included global clinical response and nephrotoxicity, as well as the economic costs and effectiveness derived from the vancomycin monitoring program. There were no significant differences between the TDM and control groups in the outcome measures, except for the incidence of nephrotoxicity: the rates of minor nephrotoxicity were 33.3% and 13.5% in the control and TDM groups, respectively. The corresponding figures for moderate nephrotoxicity were 9.1% and 0%. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that TDM independently reduced the incidence of nephrotoxicity in this patient population. On the basis of this reduced nephrotoxicity, a incremental cost of $435 per case of nephrotoxicity prevented was found for vancomycin serum concentration monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: A decreased incidence of nephrotoxicity provides evidence of a real clinical benefit to patient management in patients with hematologic malignancies. The TDM for vancomycin therapy in this high-risk population has been shown to be a cost-effective procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8841156     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(96)90060-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  18 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring: do the improved outcomes justify the costs?

Authors:  G E Schumacher; J T Barr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

Authors:  Tamar F Barlam; Sara E Cosgrove; Lilian M Abbo; Conan MacDougall; Audrey N Schuetz; Edward J Septimus; Arjun Srinivasan; Timothy H Dellit; Yngve T Falck-Ytter; Neil O Fishman; Cindy W Hamilton; Timothy C Jenkins; Pamela A Lipsett; Preeti N Malani; Larissa S May; Gregory J Moran; Melinda M Neuhauser; Jason G Newland; Christopher A Ohl; Matthew H Samore; Susan K Seo; Kavita K Trivedi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Lucia Dose; Massimo Baraldo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Pharmacokinetics and dose requirements of vancomycin in neonates.

Authors:  C Grimsley; A H Thomson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Vancomycin dosage optimization in patients with malignant haematological disease by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Maria del Mar Fernández de Gatta; Dolores Santos Buelga; Amparo Sánchez Navarro; Alfonso Dominguez-Gil; Maria Jose García
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Richard S Slavik; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  A New Method for Individualized Digoxin Dosing in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Ana Martin-Suarez; David García González; Juan F Macías Núñez; Ramón Ardanuy Albajar; M Victoria Calvo Hernández
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

Authors:  M H Ensom; T K Chang; P Patel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.577

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.