Literature DB >> 11735602

Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

M H Ensom1, T K Chang, P Patel.   

Abstract

Genetic variability in drug response occurs as a result of molecular alterations at the level of drug-metabolising enzymes, drug targets/receptors, and drug transport proteins. In this paper, we discuss the possibility that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the future will involve not the mere measurement and interpretation of drug concentrations but will include both traditional TDM and pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM. In contrast to traditional TDM, which cannot be performed until after a drug is administered to the patient. pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM can be conducted even before treatment begins. Other advantages of genotyping over traditional TDM include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) it does not require the assumption of steady-state conditions (or patient compliance) for the interpretation of results; (ii) it can often be performed less invasively (with saliva, hair root or buccal swab samples); (iii) it can provide predictive value for multiple drugs [e.g. a number of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, CYP2C 19 or CYP2C9 substrates] rather than a single drug; (iv) it provides mechanistic, instead of merely descriptive, information; and (v) it is constant over an individual's lifetime (and not influenced by concurrent drug administration, alteration in hormonal levels or disease states). Pharmacogenetic information can be applied a priori for initial dose stratification and identification of cases where certain drugs are simply not effective. However, traditional TDM will still be required for all of the reasons that we use it now. In current clinical practice, pharmacogenetic testing is performed for only a few drugs (e.g. mercaptopurine, thioguanine, azathioprine, trastuzumab and tacrine) and in a limited number of teaching hospitals and specialist academic centres. We propose that other drugs (e.g. warfarin, phenytoin, codeine, oral hypoglycaemics, tricyclic antidepressants, aminoglycosides, digoxin, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, theophylline and clozapine) are potential candidates for pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM. However, prospective studies of phaymacogenetics-oriented TDM must be performed to determine its efficacy and cost effectiveness in optimising therapeutic effects while minimising toxicity. In the future, in addition to targeting a patient's drug concentrations within a therapeutic range, pharmacists are likely to be making dosage recommendations for individual drugs on the basis of the individual patient's genotype. As we enter the era of personalised drug therapy, we will be able to identify not only the best drug to be administered to a particular patient, but also the most effective and safest dosage from the outset of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735602     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140110-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   5.577


  186 in total

1.  Metabolism of isoniazid in man as related to the occurrence of peripheral neuritis.

Authors:  H B HUGHES; J P BIEHL; A P JONES; L H SCHMIDT
Journal:  Am Rev Tuberc       Date:  1954-08

2.  Serial pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides: a community hospital experience.

Authors:  D E Hoffa
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  The role of the CYP2C9-Leu359 allelic variant in the tolbutamide polymorphism.

Authors:  T H Sullivan-Klose; B I Ghanayem; D A Bell; Z Y Zhang; L S Kaminsky; G M Shenfield; J O Miners; D J Birkett; J A Goldstein
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  1996-08

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Severe prolonged hypoglycemia following tolbutamide and carbutamide treatment.

Authors:  R Heikinheimo
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Molecular basis for rational megaprescribing in ultrarapid hydroxylators of debrisoquine.

Authors:  L Bertilsson; M L Dahl; F Sjöqvist; A Aberg-Wistedt; M Humble; I Johansson; E Lundqvist; M Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Relationship of polymorphism in CYP2C9 to genetic susceptibility to diclofenac-induced hepatitis.

Authors:  G P Aithal; C P Day; J B Leathart; A K Daly
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  2000-08

8.  Molecular mechanism of slow acetylation of drugs and carcinogens in humans.

Authors:  M Blum; A Demierre; D M Grant; M Heim; U A Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High clearance of (S)-warfarin in a warfarin-resistant subject.

Authors:  H O Hallak; P J Wedlund; M W Modi; I H Patel; G L Lewis; B Woodruff; A A Trowbridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Prospective comparison of traditional and pharmacokinetic aminoglycoside dosing methods.

Authors:  T R Franson; E J Quebbeman; J Whipple; R Thomson; J Bubrick; S L Rosenberger; R K Ausman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  17 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics modeling of levetiracetam in Chinese children with epilepsy.

Authors:  Ying-hui Wang; Li Wang; Wei Lu; De-wei Shang; Min-ji Wei; Ye Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Impact of genetic testing on complex diseases.

Authors:  M J E van Rijn; C M van Duijn; A J C Slooter
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  The AmpliChip CYP450 genotyping test: Integrating a new clinical tool.

Authors:  Jose de Leon; Margaret T Susce; Elaina Murray-Carmichael
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic tests as tools in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Eveline Jaquenoud Sirot; Jan Willem van der Velden; Katharina Rentsch; Chin B Eap; Pierre Baumann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics, the next challenge for pharmacy?

Authors:  Jessica P Clemerson; Katherine Payne; Paul Bissell; Claire Anderson
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-09-27

Review 6.  Efavirenz and nevirapine in HIV-1 infection : is there a role for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring?

Authors:  Karen Dahri; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lutz T Weber
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  The impact of drug metabolizing enzyme polymorphisms on outcomes after antenatal corticosteroid use.

Authors:  David M Haas; Amalia S Lehmann; Todd Skaar; Santosh Philips; Catherine L McCormick; Kyle Beagle; Scott J Hebbring; Jessica Dantzer; Lang Li; Jeesun Jung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Development and implementation of a pharmacist-managed clinical pharmacogenetics service.

Authors:  Kristine R Crews; Shane J Cross; John N McCormick; Donald K Baker; Alejandro R Molinelli; Richard Mullins; Mary V Relling; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 10.  Using pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: some ethical and economic considerations.

Authors:  Katherine I Morley; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.