Literature DB >> 26469887

A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

Federico Pea1,2, Piergiorgio Cojutti1,2, Lucia Dose1, Massimo Baraldo1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: This study explored the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) (based on therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] results, and on patients' characteristics and co-medications) on personalized linezolid therapy in a tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: A 1 year retrospective analysis of quality indicators of CPA (clinicians' adherence rate to CPA, pre-post rate of linezolid trough concentrations within the desired range and cost balance analysis) was conducted.
RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-four CPAs were provided to clinicians during 2014 for personalizing linezolid therapy in 168 patients. Clinicians' adherence to CPAs was very high (94.7%). The pre-post rate of linezolid Cmin distribution showed a favourable impact of CPA on patient care (pre-post ratio of Cmin within the desired range + 23.4%, pre, 51.2% vs. post, 74.6%). Overall, linezolid dosage was mainly reduced (56.9% of cases), whereas dose augmentation was needed only in a minority of cases (7.7%). Cost balance analysis showed that overall 1258 standard doses of linezolid (unitary dose 600 mg) were spared for treating 168 patients with a personalized dosage for a median duration of 11 days (range 3-128 days) with a cost saving of 60038.05 €.
CONCLUSION: Active computerized advice elaborated by the clinical pharmacologist on the basis of TDM results and of patient's pathophysiological data and co-medications may be cost-effective for personalizing linezolid treatment.
© 2015 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical pharmacological advice; cost balance analysis; linezolid; therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26469887      PMCID: PMC4833151          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  33 in total

Review 1.  Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  José A Caminero; Giovanni Sotgiu; Alimuddin Zumla; Giovanni Battista Migliori
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review.

Authors:  D J Touw; C Neef; A H Thomson; A A Vinks
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  The antimicrobial therapy puzzle: could pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships be helpful in addressing the issue of appropriate pneumonia treatment in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams for critically ill patients: unwarranted or essential?

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; William W Hope; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Educational and organizational interventions to improve the usefulness of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized drug dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Lucia Dose; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Massimo Baraldo; Fabrizio Fontana; Carlo Favaretti; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 4.080

6.  A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Lucia Dose; Massimo Baraldo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Impact of goal-oriented and model-based clinical pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides on clinical outcome: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N A van Lent-Evers; R A Mathôt; W P Geus; B A van Hout; A A Vinks
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of serum vancomycin concentration monitoring in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  M D Fernández de Gatta; M V Calvo; J M Hernández; D Caballero; J F San Miguel; A Domínguez-Gil
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Mississippi mud no more: cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage adjustment of vancomycin to prevent nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  William Darko; Joseph J Medicis; Adrienne Smith; Roy Guharoy; David E Lehmann
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.705

10.  Efficacy and tolerability of linezolid in chronic osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections: a case-control study.

Authors:  A Papadopoulos; D Plachouras; E Giannitsioti; G Poulakou; H Giamarellou; K Kanellakopoulou
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reappraisal of Linezolid Dosing in Renal Impairment To Improve Safety.

Authors:  Ryan L Crass; Pier Giorgio Cojutti; Manjunath P Pai; Federico Pea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Tsuji; Nicholas H G Holford; Hidefumi Kasai; Chika Ogami; Young-A Heo; Yoshitsugu Higashi; Akiko Mizoguchi; Hideto To; Yoshihiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Consulting clinical pharmacologist about treatment of inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Serbia.

Authors:  Slobodan M Janković; Dragan Milovanović; Dejana Ružić Zečević; Marko Folić; Nikola Rosić; Dejan Vulović
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Lucia Dose; Massimo Baraldo
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Vancomycin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring practices: guidelines versus real-life.

Authors:  Tatjana Van Der Heggen; Franky M Buyle; Barbara Claus; Annemie Somers; Petra Schelstraete; Peter De Paepe; Sophie Vanhaesebrouck; Pieter A J G De Cock
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of piperacillin and meropenem in routine clinical practice: a prospective cohort study in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Joan Antoni Schoenenberger-Arnaiz; Faten Ahmad-Diaz; Mar Miralbes-Torner; Ana Aragones-Eroles; Manuel Cano-Marron; Mercedes Palomar-Martinez
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-02-27

7.  Too Much of a Good Thing: Defining Antimicrobial Therapeutic Targets to Minimize Toxicity.

Authors:  Kevin J Downes; Jennifer L Goldman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Empirical Study on the Transparency of Security Risk Information in Chinese Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises Based on the ANP-DS Method.

Authors:  Jining Wang; Chong Guo; Tingqiang Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.