Literature DB >> 8838548

Effect of initial setting on convergence to optimal hearing aid setting using a simplex method.

F K Kuk1, C Lau.   

Abstract

We examined the final preferred frequency gain response (i.e. final setting) selected using different starting points (i.e. initial settings) with a modified simplex procedure. These starting points included a frequency response close to the one recommended by NAL-R (Byrne and Dillon, 1986), a frequency response with the high and low frequency gain set to the maximum (max), a frequency response with the high and low frequency gain set to the minimum (min), and one in-between these values (mid). The time taken to converge to the final setting was also recorded. Subjects judged the clarity of short discourse passages presented at 63 dB(A) in the presence of babble noise (S/N = 0). The results indicated that the majority of subjects selected the same preferred frequency response regardless of initial settings. Variations in initial settings mainly affected the convergence time to the final choice. The frequency response recommended by NAL-R required the least time to converge, while those of the extremes (min and max) required the longest convergence time. Clinical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8838548     DOI: 10.3109/03005369509076741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  5 in total

1.  Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Jennifer Retana; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Carol Mackersie; Arthur Boothroyd; Alexandra Lithgow
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Trevor T Perry; Melanie Gregan; Dianne VanTasell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Ole Hau; Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen; Thor Bundgaard Nielsen; Søren Vase Legarth
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vaisberg; Steve Beaulac; Danielle Glista; Ewan A Macpherson; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.