A Chak1, G S Cooper, E W Blades, M Canto, M V Sivak. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, OH 44106, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends a minimum of 100 supervised colonoscopies prior to assessment of technical competence. To establish a measurable standard for competence and to assess this recommendation, performance of colonoscopies at a university hospital was studied. METHODS: Colonoscopic preparation, surgical history, medication usage, technical maneuvers, extent of colon intubated, success rate, and cecal intubation time were prospectively monitored for first-year trainees, second-year trainees, and attendings. RESULTS: Excluding patients with poor preparations or colonic resections, 496 colonoscopies were studied. First-year trainees (n = 5) required attending assistance in 73 of 79 (92%) procedures. Second-year trainees (n = 7), who had performed a mean of 123 colonoscopies prior to the study, required attending assistance in 37 of 102 (36.3%) procedures. Attendings (n = 7) successfully intubated the cecum in 297 of 315 (94.3%) colonoscopies in a median time of 10.5 minutes. Second-year trainees were less successful than attendings in cecal intubation (success rate = 84%, p < 0.05), and required more time (median = 14.5 minutes, p < 0.01). More technical maneuvers were performed, and a lesser extent of colon was intubated, during trainee colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a 90% success rate and a median cecal intubation time of less than 15 minutes as reasonable standards for measuring technical competence. Trainees do not achieve this standard after the performance of 100 supervised colonoscopies.
INTRODUCTION: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends a minimum of 100 supervised colonoscopies prior to assessment of technical competence. To establish a measurable standard for competence and to assess this recommendation, performance of colonoscopies at a university hospital was studied. METHODS: Colonoscopic preparation, surgical history, medication usage, technical maneuvers, extent of colon intubated, success rate, and cecal intubation time were prospectively monitored for first-year trainees, second-year trainees, and attendings. RESULTS: Excluding patients with poor preparations or colonic resections, 496 colonoscopies were studied. First-year trainees (n = 5) required attending assistance in 73 of 79 (92%) procedures. Second-year trainees (n = 7), who had performed a mean of 123 colonoscopies prior to the study, required attending assistance in 37 of 102 (36.3%) procedures. Attendings (n = 7) successfully intubated the cecum in 297 of 315 (94.3%) colonoscopies in a median time of 10.5 minutes. Second-year trainees were less successful than attendings in cecal intubation (success rate = 84%, p < 0.05), and required more time (median = 14.5 minutes, p < 0.01). More technical maneuvers were performed, and a lesser extent of colon was intubated, during trainee colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a 90% success rate and a median cecal intubation time of less than 15 minutes as reasonable standards for measuring technical competence. Trainees do not achieve this standard after the performance of 100 supervised colonoscopies.
Authors: Bret J Spier; Emily T Durkin; Andrew J Walker; Eugene Foley; Eric A Gaumnitz; Patrick R Pfau Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 4.584