Literature DB >> 8836205

Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.

K Parham1, H B Zhao, D O Kim.   

Abstract

1. To elucidate the peripheral contribution to "echo" processing in the auditory system, we examined the characteristics of auditory nerve responses to click-pair stimuli in unanesthetized, decerebrate cats. We used equilevel click pairs at peak levels of 45, 65, and 85 dB SPL re 20 microPa. The interclick intervals ranged from 1 to 32 ms. This study reports results from 78 auditory nerve fibers in 7 cats. The fibers were divided into 2 groups: 33 low- and 45 high-spontaneous rate (SR), with SRs less than and > or = 20 spikes/s, respectively. A method was introduced to quantify the second-click response, and its recovery was examined as a function of the interclick interval. 2. In general, auditory nerve fibers showed a gradual recovery of the second-click response as interclick interval was increased. Noticeable differences in the second-click response recovery functions emerged among fiber populations that were related to the SR. Low-SR fibers showed little change in the recovery functions of the second-click response as the click level was increased from 45 to 85 dB SPL. In contrast, high-SR fibers showed slower recoveries with increasing click level from 45 to 85 dB SPL. At 45 and 65 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the two SR groups were similar. At 85 dB SPL, high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers, regardless of fiber characteristic frequency. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response ranged from 1 to 6 ms (mean, 1.4 ms) among low-SR fibers. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response for high-SR fibers, whereas similar to those for the low-SR fibers at 45 and 65 dB SPL, ranged from 2 to 16 ms (mean, 3 ms) for high-SR fibers, at 85 dB SPL. 3. We also examined auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) evoked by click-pair stimuli for various interclick intervals and click levels. With increasing interclick interval, the amplitude of the second-click CAP increased, and with increasing level, the second-click CAP showed slower recovery. At 45 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the second-click CAP were similar to those of the high- and low-SR fibers. At higher levels, the CAP exhibited lower second-click response values than both high- and low-SR fiber populations for interclick intervals < 4-8 ms. At 85 dB SPL, as interclick interval increased, between 8 and 16 ms, the CAP second-click response converged with that of the high-SR fibers, and by 32 ms, the second-click response values were similar for the CAP, high- and low-SR fibers. 4. The present results are consistent with those of forward masking studies at the level of the auditory nerve in that both demonstrate a short-term reduction of the neural responses. However, the two results differ in that we observed that high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers in response to click-pair stimuli, opposite of the trend observed in the forward masking studies of responses to pure-tone bursts. 5. The present results on auditory nerve fiber responses to click-pair stimuli provide a reference for comparison with responses of central auditory neurons to similar stimuli. This information should serve to elucidate the peripheral contribution to the processing of echoes in the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836205     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Two measures of temporal resolution in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Kenneth S Henry; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Short-latency, goal-directed movements of the pinnae to sounds that produce auditory spatial illusions.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Elizabeth M McClaine; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intracellular recordings in response to monaural and binaural stimulation of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  S Kuwada; R Batra; T C Yin; D L Oliver; L B Haberly; T R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

6.  Physiological and psychophysical modeling of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Andrew Brughera; H Steven Colburn; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Threshold of the precedence effect in noise.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mismatch negativity and adaptation measures of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Theresa Hammer; Holly-Lolan Banks; Chelsea Benson; Jing Xiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Forward masking in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Albert S Berrebi
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Megan D Gall; Gavin M Bidelman; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.