Literature DB >> 8835958

The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality.

J H Maki1, M R Prince, F J Londy, T L Chenevert.   

Abstract

The optimum infusion timing and k-space ordering for obtaining gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiograms was determined through computer modeling using temporal contrast characteristics obtained from patient gadolinium infusion data. The effects of bolus timing were evaluated by varying the relationship between peak intravascular gadolinium concentration and the time at which the center of k space was acquired (tck) for sequential and centric acquisition techniques. Flow phantom experiments were performed to validate the theoretical computations. Gadolinium concentration at the time of central k-space acquisition determines intravascular signal intensity. Artifacts, including vessel broadening and edge ringing, depend on the order in which k space is collected and on how rapidly the gadolinium concentration changes. Artifacts are greatest when the center of k space is acquired before the intravascular gadolinium peak. Application of the optimal infusion timing results in preferential arterial enhancement with a minimum of artifacts in patients undergoing MR angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8835958     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  40 in total

1.  Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  J J Westenberg; M N Wasser; R J van der Geest; P M Pattynama; A de Roos; J Vanderschoot; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography using fluoroscopic triggering and an elliptical centric view order.

Authors:  S J Riederer; S B Fain; D G Kruger; R F Busse
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

3.  Cardiovascular MR angiography.

Authors:  M R Prince; J M Rubin
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

4.  Contrast enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

5.  Real-time imaging and triggering of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiograms using MR fluoroscopy.

Authors:  S J Riederer; S B Fain; D G Kruger; R F Busse
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Improved venous suppression and spatial resolution with SENSE in elliptical centric 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; David G Kruger; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Dose optimization of contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography.

Authors:  M Unterweger; J M Froehlich; R A Kubik-Huch; B Seifert; M Birrer; T Huber; R Otto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Feathering: Vertebral artery pseudostenosis with elliptical centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  J Huston; M A Bernstein; S J Riederer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Radial sliding-window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR).

Authors:  Hyun J Jeong; Ty A Cashen; Michael C Hurley; Christopher Eddleman; Christopher Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Optimal k-space sampling for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography.

Authors:  Ting Song; Andrew F Laine; Qun Chen; Henry Rusinek; Louisa Bokacheva; Ruth P Lim; Gerhard Laub; Randall Kroeker; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.