Literature DB >> 15875194

Dose optimization of contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography.

M Unterweger1, J M Froehlich, R A Kubik-Huch, B Seifert, M Birrer, T Huber, R Otto.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to compare the diagnostic performance of a single-contrast or a double-contrast dose of carotid contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA). One-hundred nineteen patients (mean age 65+/-14.4 years) underwent carotid contrast-enhanced MRA with a standardized protocol (repetition time/echo 3.73 ms/1.38 ms, flip-angle 25 degrees, acquisition-time 19 s, voxel size 1.2 x 1.2 x 0.9 mm3) on a 1.5-T scanner (Sonata, Siemens-Medical-Systems) using a neck phased-array coil. Contrast agent was administered intravenously at a rate of 3.0 ml/s, either as a single dose (n=57; 0.1 mmol/kg body weight) or as a double dose (n=62; 0.2 mmol/kg body weight) of meglumine gadoterate (0.5 M/l), followed by 30 ml saline. Qualitative image analysis was performed on maximum intensity projections using a five-point scale. Signal intensities were measured at three different vascular levels on both sides to assess the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). Image quality was rated as good or excellent in all cases. A double dose did not influence the efficacy of carotid enhancement (CNR single dose 69.12+/-19.8; CNR double dose 70.01+/-20.7; p = 0.81) compared with a single dose. In both dose groups the mean CNRs were inversely related to bodyweight, despite adjusted contrast volumes (p=0.0005). Double-dose contrast-enhanced carotid MRA is not superior to single-dose MRA, as overall diagnostic performance and quantitative contrast enhancement are equal. Being more cost-efficient, a single-dose administration of contrast agent is recommended for MRA of the carotid arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15875194     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2756-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?].

Authors:  K Oberholzer; K F Kreitner; P Kalden; M Pitton; M Requardt; M Thelen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status.

Authors:  James F M Meaney
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  P C Sundgren; P Sundén; A Lindgren; J Lanke; S Holtås; E-M Larsson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography.

Authors:  Markus Lenhart; Nicola Framme; Markus Völk; Michael Strotzer; Christoph Manke; Wolfgang R Nitz; Thomas Finkenzeller; Stefan Feuerbach; Johann Link
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Multi-detector row CT: effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement.

Authors:  J E Roos; L M Desbiolles; D Weishaupt; S Wildermuth; P R Hilfiker; B Marincek; T Boehm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-04

6.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.

Authors:  D S Willig; P A Turski; R Frayne; V B Graves; F R Korosec; J S Swan; C A Mistretta; T M Grist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Basic physics of MR contrast agents and maximization of image contrast.

Authors:  R E Hendrick; E M Haacke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  L Kopka; R Vosshenrich; J Rodenwaldt; E Grabbe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Using a 1 M Gd-chelate (gadobutrol) for total-body three-dimensional MR angiography: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Mathias Goyen; Christoph U Herborn; Florian M Vogt; Knut Kröger; Rüdiger Verhagen; Fan Yang; Silke Bosk; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multicenter, intraindividual comparison of single-dose gadobenate dimeglumine and double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries (the Supra-Aortic VALUE study).

Authors:  Yanjun Li; X Li; D Li; J Lu; X Xing; F Yan; Yuan Li; X Wang; R Iezzi; F De Cobelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.825

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.