Literature DB >> 2710757

Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix.

R K Peters1, M B Bear, D Thomas.   

Abstract

Despite the widespread availability and demonstrated efficacy of screening with the Papanicolaou smear, many women are screened irregularly or not at all. This study was designed to identify the barriers that prevent those women at risk for cervical cancer from being screened. Complete cervical cytology screening histories were taken during a population-based case-control study of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix involving 200 patients and their matched neighborhood controls. Smears taken during the previous 5 years were verified whenever possible. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify seven factors that significantly (P less than 0.05) and independently predicted regular recent screening among both cases and controls [failure to understand the importance and screening nature of cervical smears (-), expressed fears of embarrassment (-), having had a urogenital infection (+), number of pregnancies during the last 5 years (+), the number of pregnancies for which no prenatal care was sought (-), and knowledge of the recommended screening interval (+)], two variables that predicted screening among cases but not controls [age (-) and number of years of oral contraceptives use (+)], and one that predicted screening only among controls [years of living in the United States (+)]. Education, income, Latin heritage, being married, having a regular physician for one's medical care, and all other methods of birth control were significant predictors of screening in the univariate analyses, but were explained by the other more powerful predictors in the multivariate analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710757     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90059-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  15 in total

1.  The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States.

Authors:  T S Tang; L J Solomon; C J Yeh; J K Worden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  What factors hinder women of color from obtaining preventive health care?

Authors:  Llewellyn J Cornelius; Pamela L Smith; Gaynell M Simpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Rate of death from cervical cancer among native Indian women in British Columbia.

Authors:  P R Band; R P Gallagher; W J Threlfall; T G Hislop; M Deschamps; J Smith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and cancer screening among inner-city African-American women.

Authors:  J F Sung; D S Blumenthal; R J Coates; E Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 6.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Health beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese Americans.

Authors:  Grace X Ma; Wanzhen Gao; Carolyn Y Fang; Yin Tan; Ziding Feng; Shaokui Ge; Joseph An Nguyen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors among Chinese immigrants in Seattle.

Authors:  James D Ralston; Victoria M Taylor; Yutaka Yasui; Alan Kuniyuki; J Carey Jackson; Shin-Ping Tu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-02

9.  Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?

Authors:  T G Hislop; H F Clarke; M Deschamps; R Joseph; P R Band; J Smith; N Le; R Atleo
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Cervical cancer rates by population size of towns: implications for cancer control programs.

Authors:  A P Polednak; J T Flannery; D T Janerich
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.