Literature DB >> 8825222

Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system.

A M van den Besselaar1, K Breddin, G Lutze, J Parker-Williams, U Taborski, G Vogel, W Tritschler, R Zerback, R Leinberger.   

Abstract

The analytical performance of the new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system CoaguChek was examined in a multicenter evaluation at six hospitals. The coefficients of variation of the INR obtained in the CoaguChek imprecision study were approximately 7% in the control plasma provided (within-run and day-to-day) and 4% in blood (within-run). The prothrombin times were ascertained in capillary blood (CoaguChek PT Test) and citrated venous plasma (Hepato Quick, Thromborel S) from 359 patients under oral anticoagulation therapy with phenprocoumon, acenocoumarin or warfarin. The agreement with the test results obtained with the comparison methods was acceptable versus Hepato Quick assay (n = 359; y = 1.23 x -0.49, r = 0.888) and good versus Thromborel S method (n = 359; y = 1.09 x -0.28, r = 0.895). A simplified assessment of all test results (n = 795) in a nine-field comparison table showed a concordance with the comparison methods of more than 80 (Hepato Quick: 81%, Thromborel S: 83%). The concordance between Hepato-Quick and Thromborel S was slightly higher (88%). Its good analytical performance and convenient handling recommend the CoaguChek system as a suitable system for decentralized prothrombin time testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8825222     DOI: 10.1097/00001721-199512000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  9 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation in patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  R C Tait
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Oral anticoagulation control: the European perspective.

Authors:  David A Fitzmaurice
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Accuracy, precision, and quality control for point-of-care testing of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR).

Authors:  R S Riley; D Rowe; L M Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Experience with INR self-management: patient selection and complication rates.

Authors:  H Voeller; C Dovifat; K Wegscheider
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-12

6.  Optimal Frequency of Patient Monitoring and Intensity of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: An International Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Home monitoring of anticoagulation.

Authors:  Julie Hambleton
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Comparison of laboratory and immediate diagnosis of coagulation for patients under oral anticoagulation therapy before dental surgery.

Authors:  Birgit Kruse-Loesler; Matthias Kelker; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 2.151

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.