Literature DB >> 14760210

Home monitoring of anticoagulation.

Julie Hambleton1.   

Abstract

Small portable devices that generate a prothrombin time/INR from fingerstick capillary blood simplify warfarin management by allowing selected patients to monitor and manage their own warfarin dose. Early studies established that patients can self-test at home, with results as accurate as those obtained by practitioners. Point-of-care testing of elderly patients resulted in tighter INR control and a lower incidence of major hemorrhage, especially at the initiation of anticoagulant therapy. Patients can also successfully self-manage warfarin therapy. Larger, prospective, randomized intervention studies have shown that patient self-management led to greater time spent within the therapeutic INR range. However, a shift toward patient self-testing will likely require centralized implementation of patient education, training, and follow up that will need to be established in the clinic setting or by a third party.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14760210     DOI: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000014591.32012.1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Ciba Corning Biotrack 512 coagulation monitor for the control of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  I Jennings; R J Luddington; T Baglin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar; K Breddin; G Lutze; J Parker-Williams; U Taborski; G Vogel; W Tritschler; R Zerback; R Leinberger
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.276

3.  Home prothrombin time monitoring after the initiation of warfarin therapy. A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  R H White; S A McCurdy; H von Marensdorff; D E Woodruff; L Leftgoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A multicomponent intervention to prevent major bleeding complications in older patients receiving warfarin. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  R J Beyth; L Quinn; C S Landefeld
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison.

Authors:  M E Cromheecke; M Levi; L P Colly; B J de Mol; M H Prins; B A Hutten; R Mak; K C Keyzers; H R Büller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Bedside monitoring of warfarin therapy by a whole blood capillary coagulation monitor.

Authors:  Y Yano; J Kambayashi; K Murata; E Shiba; M Sakon; T Kawasaki; T Mori
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Are capillary whole blood coagulation monitors suitable for the control of oral anticoagulant treatment by the international normalized ratio?

Authors:  A Tripodi; A A Arbini; V Chantarangkul; D Bettega; P M Mannucci
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  A structured teaching and self-management program for patients receiving oral anticoagulation: a randomized controlled trial. Working Group for the Study of Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation.

Authors:  P T Sawicki
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Decentralized testing for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time using a dry chemistry portable analyzer.

Authors:  V L Rose; S C Dermott; B F Murray; M M McIver; K A High; B J Oberhardt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Long-term patient self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  J E Ansell; N Patel; D Ostrovsky; E Nozzolillo; A M Peterson; L Fish
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-13
View more
  4 in total

1.  The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Thomas W Arant; Samuel L Ellis; Heather Ulrich
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Carl J Heneghan; Josep M Garcia-Alamino; Elizabeth A Spencer; Alison M Ward; Rafael Perera; Clare Bankhead; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Fitzmaurice; Kamal R Mahtani; Igho J Onakpoya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-05

3.  Home management of INR in the public health system: feasibility of self-management of oral anticoagulation and long-term performance of individual POC devices in determining INR.

Authors:  Sabrina da Silva Saraiva; Fernanda Andrade Orsi; Marcos Pereira Santos; Tania Machado; Silmara Montalvão; Carolina Costa-Lima; Erich Vinícius de Paula; Marina Pereira Colella; Joyce Annichino-Bizzacchi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Factors determining patients' intentions to use point-of-care testing medical devices for self-monitoring: the case of international normalized ratio self-testing.

Authors:  Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis; Kate Hone; Richard Kaczmarski
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.