Literature DB >> 11711687

Accuracy, precision, and quality control for point-of-care testing of oral anticoagulation.

A M van den Besselaar1.   

Abstract

Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy is usually monitored by noting changes in a tissue factor-induced coagulation time ("prothrombin time") test on whole blood or plasma and expressed as an International Normalized Ratio (INR). Current point-of-care (POC) instruments for monitoring OAC therapy display both the calculated prothrombin time (PT) and the INR. Although many attempts have been made to improve the accuracy and precision of INR determinations in daily practice, it is impossible to eliminate all uncertainty because the PT test is sensitive to multiple factors in the patient's blood specimen. The accuracy of the average INR determined with a POC instrument depends on its calibration against reference methods. Quality control (QC) materials for POC devices are different from patients' samples and may not exactly reflect the real clinical situation. Nevertheless, internal and external QC schemes for POC devices are valuable to investigate their performance in daily practice. Calibration can be improved by direct comparison of a POC system against an established international reference preparation method. In general, the precision of the INR measured with a POC device is slightly lower than the precision achieved with available automated laboratory instruments. The greater imprecision should be weighed against the clinical advantages of a POC testing device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711687     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012734426811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Ciba Corning Biotrack 512 coagulation monitor for the control of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  I Jennings; R J Luddington; T Baglin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Accuracy of a portable International Normalization Ratio monitor in outpatients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison with a laboratory reference standard using clinically relevant criteria for agreement.

Authors:  J D Douketis; A Lane; J Milne; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar; K Breddin; G Lutze; J Parker-Williams; U Taborski; G Vogel; W Tritschler; R Zerback; R Leinberger
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.276

4.  Accuracy and precision of the TAS analyser for near-patient INR testing by non-pathology staff in the community.

Authors:  P G Cachia; E McGregor; S Adlakha; P Davey; B M Goudie
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Precision and accuracy of the international normalized ratio in oral anticoagulant control.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1996-10

6.  Monitoring oral anticoagulant treatment with the TAS near-patient test system: comparison with conventional thromboplastins.

Authors:  S Kitchen; F E Preston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effect of international sensitivity index (ISI) of thromboplastins on precision of international normalised ratios (INR)

Authors:  D A Taberner; L Poller; J M Thomson; K V Darby
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Reliability and clinical impact of the normalization of the prothrombin times in oral anticoagulant control.

Authors:  E A Loeliger; A M van den Besselaar; S M Lewis
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1985-02-18       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Validation of current practice and a near patient testing method for oral-anticoagulant control in general practice.

Authors:  D A Seamark; S Backhouse; P Barber; J Hichens; R Lee; R Powell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Influence of three types of automated coagulometers on the international sensitivity index (ISI) of rabbit, human, and recombinant human tissue factor preparations--a multicenter study.

Authors:  A M van den Besselaar; L L Houbouyan; M F Aillaud; K W Denson; M Johnston; S Kitchen; T L Lindahl; M Marren; M E Martinuzzo; C Droullé; A Tripodi; C Vergnes
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  4 in total

1.  Two monitoring methods of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve prothesis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Zhiping Wang; Jingsong Ou; Yingqi Xu; Song Yang; Xi Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The future of anticoagulation clinics.

Authors:  B Gail Macik
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Improving anticoagulation therapy using point-of-care testing and a standardized protocol.

Authors:  Curtis A Franke; Lori M Dickerson; Peter J Carek
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Utilization of oral anticoagulation in a teaching hospital in Nigeria.

Authors:  Rc Anakwue; S Ocheni; Aj Madu
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.