Literature DB >> 8821835

Patients' views in the choice of renal transplant.

J L Holley1, C McCauley, B Doherty, L Stackiewicz, J P Johnson.   

Abstract

Little is known about chronic dialysis patients' reasons for electing renal transplantation. We investigated chronic dialysis patients' reasons for choosing to be listed or not listed for renal transplantation. Chronic dialysis patients were asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of demographic information and questions related to desire for transplantation and previous transplant experience. The mean age of the dialysis population was 48 +/- 15 years (range 16 to 81 years); the population was 61% women, 39% African American, and 26% diabetic. The questionnaires of the 95 patients eligible for transplantation were analyzed. Forty-four percent of the eligible patients were active on a transplant waiting list; 56% of patients refused transplantation. Twenty-nine percent of the surveyed patients had had at least one previous transplant. Listed patients were younger (43 vs. 52 years), had fewer years of ESRD (5 vs. 9 years), and were more likely to be on home dialysis therapy (55% vs. 32%). There were no differences between listed and unlisted patients in gender, race, years of education, marital status, children, diabetes mellitus, and previous transplant experience. African American patients reporting strong religious beliefs were less likely to be listed for transplantation (76% vs. 24%); religious beliefs were not related to white patients' listing for transplantation. The most reported reason for electing transplantation was "hoping for a better quality of life" (86% of respondents). More never-transplanted patients elected transplantation "hoping it will make me live longer" (69% vs. 25% with previous transplant) and because their doctor (50% vs. 6%) or family (42% vs. 6%) thought it was a good idea. Of patients who declined transplant, 92% with previous transplant experience indicated that the experience discouraged them from seeking retransplantation; 59% of patients without transplant experience reported that seeing what happened to others with a failed transplant affected their decision not to seek transplantation. Our findings suggest that race and gender differences in electing transplant may disappear when all patients are actively solicited for transplantation. However, older patients may be less likely to elect transplant because they are more satisfied with life on dialysis or less willing to take risks. Further study of patients' reasons for electing transplantation is required before demographic variations in transplant choices can be accurately interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8821835     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1996.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  12 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Joanne M Churak
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Kidney patients' intention to receive a deceased donor transplant: development of stage of change, decisional balance and self-efficacy measures.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; Mark L Robbins; Andrea L Paiva; Shelley S Hyland
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-04

3.  Protocol of the KTFT-TALK study to reduce racial disparities in kidney transplant evaluation and living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kellee Bornemann; Emilee Croswell; Menna Abaye; Cindy L Bryce; Chung-Chou H Chang; Deborah S Good; Cathleen A Freehling Heiles; Mary Amanda Dew; L Ebony Boulware; Amit D Tevar; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Relationship between patients' perceptions of disadvantage and discrimination and listing for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ann C Klassen; Allyson G Hall; Brit Saksvig; Barbara Curbow; David K Klassen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Unexpected Race and Ethnicity Differences in the US National Veterans Affairs Kidney Transplant Program.

Authors:  Larissa Myaskovsky; Kellee Kendall; Xingyuan Li; Chung-Chou H Chang; John R Pleis; Emilee Croswell; C Graham Ford; Galen E Switzer; Anthony Langone; Anuja Mittal-Henkle; Somnath Saha; Christie P Thomas; Jareen Adams Flohr; Mohan Ramkumar; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Perceived discrimination predicts longer time to be accepted for kidney transplant.

Authors:  Larissa Myaskovsky; Donna Almario Doebler; Donna M Posluszny; Mary Amanda Dew; Mark Unruh; Linda F Fried; Galen E Switzer; Sunghee Kim; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mohan Ramkumar; Ron Shapiro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Non-medical factors influencing access to renal transplantation.

Authors:  Eszter Panna Vamos; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Promoting access to renal transplantation: the role of social support networks in completing pre-transplant evaluations.

Authors:  Cheryl R Clark; Leroi S Hicks; Joseph H Keogh; Arnold M Epstein; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality--the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings!

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Zhi Hui Li; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Meng Chan Choong; Marjorie Wai Yin Foo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Social Determinants of Health and Race Disparities in Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Hannah Wesselman; Christopher Graham Ford; Yuridia Leyva; Xingyuan Li; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mary Amanda Dew; Kellee Kendall; Emilee Croswell; John R Pleis; Yue Harn Ng; Mark L Unruh; Ron Shapiro; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.