Literature DB >> 23123668

Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality--the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings!

Konstadina Griva1, Zhi Hui Li, Alden Yuanhong Lai, Meng Chan Choong, Marjorie Wai Yin Foo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the factors influencing decision-making about dialysis modality, integrating the perspectives of patients, their families, and health care professionals within an Asian population. The study further sought to understand the low penetration rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in Singapore. ♢
METHODS: A sample of 59 participants comprising pre-dialysis patients, dialysis patients, caregivers, and health care professionals (HCPs) participated in semi-structured interviews to explore the decision-making process and their views about various dialysis modalities. Data were thematically analyzed using NVivo9 (QSR International, Doncaster, Australia) to explore barriers to and facilitators of various dialysis modalities and decisional support needs. ♢
RESULTS: Fear of infection, daily commitment to PD, and misperceptions of PD emerged as barriers to PD. Side effects, distance to dialysis centers, and fear of needling and pain were barriers to hemodialysis (HD). The experiences of other patients, communicated informally or opportunistically, influenced the preferences and choices of patients and family members for a dialysis modality. Patients and families value input from HCPs and yet express strong needs to discuss subjective experiences of life on dialysis (PD or HD) with other patients before making a decision about dialysis modality. ♢
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-dialysis education should expand its focus on the family as the unit of care and should provide opportunities for interaction with dialysis patients and for peer-led learning. Barriers to PD, especially misperceptions and misunderstandings, can be targeted to improve PD uptake.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; dialysis modality; patient education

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123668      PMCID: PMC3649897          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  47 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers.

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality.

Authors:  Belén Marrón; Juan Carlos Martínez Ocaña; Mercedes Salgueira; Guillermina Barril; José M Lamas; Marisa Martín; Tomás Sierra; Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Amparo Soldevilla; Francisco Martínez
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  What influences patient choice of treatment modality at the pre-dialysis stage?

Authors:  Dimitrios Chanouzas; Khai Ping Ng; Bassam Fallouh; Jyoti Baharani
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Cultural aspects of nondisclosure.

Authors:  C J Orona; B A Koenig; A J Davis
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Dialysis patients' preferences for family-based advance care planning.

Authors:  S C Hines; J J Glover; J L Holley; A S Babrow; L A Badzek; A H Moss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Outcomes in peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis--a comparative assessment of survival and quality of life.

Authors:  R Gokal; M Figueras; A Ollé; J Rovira; X Badia
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Patient and physician predictors of peritoneal dialysis technique failure: a population based, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mala Chidambaram; Joanne M Bargman; Robert R Quinn; Peter C Austin; Janet E Hux; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  Peritoneal dialysis: better than, equal to, or worse than hemodialysis? Data worth knowing before choosing a dialysis modality.

Authors:  E Thodis; P Passadakis; V Vargemezis; D G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 9.  Health economics of renal replacement therapy: perspectives from Singapore.

Authors:  Chorh-Chuan Tan; Choong-Meng Chan; Chee-Khun Ho; Kok Seng Wong; Evan J C Lee; Keng Thye Woo
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.545

Review 10.  Peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes: are the benefits greater than the disadvantages?

Authors:  Satoru Kuriyama
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  22 in total

1.  Do Dialysis Decision Aids Improve Treatment Decision-Making?

Authors:  Rachael Morton
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Quality of life and emotional distress in patients and burden in caregivers: a comparison between assisted peritoneal dialysis and self-care peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  K Griva; C S Goh; W C A Kang; Z L Yu; M C Chan; S Y Wu; T Krishnasamy; M Foo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Dialysis Organization Online Information on Kidney Failure Treatments: A Content Analysis Using Corpus Linguistics.

Authors:  Rebecca Jane Allen; Fahad Saeed
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  The Course of Quality of Life in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A 12-month Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Haikel A Lim; Zhenli Yu; Augustine W C Kang; Marjorie W Y Foo; Konstadina Griva
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08

Review 5.  Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a chance for a new beginning.

Authors:  Rohini Arramreddy; Sijie Zheng; Anjali B Saxena; Scott E Liebman; Leslie Wong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  The associations between the family education and mortality of patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Kai Yang; Qing-Feng Han; Tong-Ying Zhu; Ye-Ping Ren; Jiang-Hua Chen; Hui-Ping Zhao; Meng-Hua Chen; Jie Dong; Yue Wang; Chuan-Ming Hao; Rui Zhang; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Mei Wang; Na Tian; Hai-Yan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical utility of far-infrared therapy for improvement of vascular access blood flow and pain control in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Soo Jeong Choi; Eun Hee Cho; Hye Min Jo; Changwook Min; Young Sok Ji; Moo Yong Park; Jin Kuk Kim; Seung Duk Hwang
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  A Comparison of Uremic Pruritus in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Hon-Yen Wu; Yu-Sen Peng; Hung-Yuan Chen; Wan-Chuan Tsai; Ju-Yeh Yang; Shih-Ping Hsu; Mei-Fen Pai; Hui-Min Lu; Ju-Fen Chiang; Mei-Ju Ko; Su-Ying Wen; Hsien-Ching Chiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Factors Associated with the Choice of Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Pei-Chun Chiang; Jia-Jeng Hou; Ing-Ching Jong; Peir-Haur Hung; Chih-Yen Hsiao; Tsung-Liang Ma; Yueh-Han Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Anxiety and depression in patients with end-stage renal disease: impact and management challenges - a narrative review.

Authors:  Zhong Sheng Goh; Konstadina Griva
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.