Literature DB >> 31397801

Unexpected Race and Ethnicity Differences in the US National Veterans Affairs Kidney Transplant Program.

Larissa Myaskovsky1, Kellee Kendall2, Xingyuan Li3, Chung-Chou H Chang2, John R Pleis4, Emilee Croswell2, C Graham Ford1, Galen E Switzer2,5, Anthony Langone6,7, Anuja Mittal-Henkle8, Somnath Saha9,10, Christie P Thomas11,12, Jareen Adams Flohr13, Mohan Ramkumar2,13, Mary Amanda Dew14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minorities have lower rates of deceased kidney transplantation (DDKT) and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) in the United States. We examined whether social determinants of health (eg, demographics, cultural, psychosocial, knowledge factors) could account for differences in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Kidney Transplantation (KT) Program.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter longitudinal cohort study of 611 Veterans undergoing evaluation for KT at all National VA KT Centers (2010-2012) using an interview after KT evaluation and tracking participants via medical records through 2017.
RESULTS: Hispanics were more likely to get any KT (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.8 [1.2-2.8]) or DDKT (SHR [95% CI]: 2.0 [1.3-3.2]) than non-Hispanic white in univariable analysis. Social determinants of health, including marital status (SHR [95% CI]: 0.6 [0.4-0.9]), religious objection to LDKT (SHR [95% CI]: 0.6 [0.4-1.0]), and donor preference (SHR [95% CI]: 2.5 [1.2-5.1]), accounted for some racial differences, and changes to Kidney Allocation System policy (SHR [95% CI]: 0.3 [0.2-0.5]) mitigated race differences in DDKT in multivariable analysis. For LDKT, non-Hispanic African American Veterans were less likely to receive an LDKT than non-Hispanic white (SHR [95% CI]: 0.2 [0.0-0.7]), but accounting for age (SHR [95% CI]: 1.0 [0.9-1.0]), insurance (SHR [95% CI]: 5.9 [1.1-33.7]), presenting with a living donor (SHR [95% CI]: 4.1 [1.4-12.3]), dialysis duration (SHR [95% CI]: 0.3 [0.2-0.6]), network of potential donors (SHR [95% CI]: 1.0 [1.0-1.1]), self-esteem (SHR [95% CI]: 0.4 [0.2-0.8]), transplant knowledge (SHR [95% CI]: 1.3 [1.0-1.7]), and changes to Kidney Allocation System policy (SHR [95% CI]: 10.3 [2.5-42.1]) in multivariable analysis eliminated those disparities.
CONCLUSIONS: The VA KT Program does not exhibit the same pattern of disparities in KT receipt as non-VA centers. Transplant centers can use identified risk factors to target patients who may need more support to ensure they receive a transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31397801      PMCID: PMC6937592          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  76 in total

1.  The role of social networks: a novel hypothesis to explain the phenomenon of racial disparity in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Teri Arthur
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Cultural competency of a mobile, customized patient education tool for improving potential kidney transplant recipients' knowledge and decision-making.

Authors:  David A Axelrod; Crystal S Kynard-Amerson; David Wojciechowski; Marie Jacobs; Krista L Lentine; Mark Schnitzler; John D Peipert; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Access to kidney transplantation among patients insured by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  John S Gill; Syed Hussain; Caren Rose; Sundaram Hariharan; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Rates of completion of the medical evaluation for renal transplantation.

Authors:  Francis L Weng; Marshall M Joffe; Harold I Feldman; Kevin C Mange
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Early Experience with the New Kidney Allocation System: A Perspective from UNOS.

Authors:  Darren E Stewart; David K Klassen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Health-related correlates of perceived discrimination in HIV care.

Authors:  Sheryl Thorburn Bird; Laura M Bogart; Douglas L Delahanty
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.078

7.  Everybody needs a cheerleader to get a kidney transplant: a qualitative study of the patient barriers and facilitators to kidney transplantation in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Teri Browne; Ahinee Amamoo; Rachel E Patzer; Jenna Krisher; Henry Well; Jennifer Gander; Stephen O Pastan
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Dialysis facility staff perceptions of racial, gender, and age disparities in access to renal transplantation.

Authors:  Kristie J Lipford; Laura McPherson; Reem Hamoda; Teri Browne; Jennifer C Gander; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  Depression and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Joseph Chilcot; Benjamin Walter Jack Spencer; Hannah Maple; Nizam Mamode
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Optimal transplant education for recipients to increase pursuit of living donation.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; Ann C Barrett; Sara L Stanley
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.065

View more
  5 in total

1.  Association of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbidities with Racial Disparities during Kidney Transplant Evaluation.

Authors:  Karly A Murphy; John W Jackson; Tanjala S Purnell; Ashton A Shaffer; Christine E Haugen; Nadia M Chu; Deidra C Crews; Silas P Norman; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Protocol for the IMPACT Trial: Improving Healthcare Outcomes in American Transplant Recipients Using Culturally-Tailored Novel Technology.

Authors:  Claudia M Rice; Pooja P Singh; Nila S Judd; Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez; Cindy K Blair; Amy Washburn; Christine Calvin; Alison Steiber; Yiliang Zhu; Christos Argyropoulos; Mark Unruh; Mary Amanda Dew; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Post-Kidney Transplant Care and Health Outcomes of US Veterans.

Authors:  Namrata Krishnan; Susan T Crowley
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Christine Park; Mandisa-Maia Jones; Samantha Kaplan; Felicitas L Koller; Julius M Wilder; L Ebony Boulware; Lisa M McElroy
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-02-12

5.  Frailty measures can be used to predict the outcome of kidney transplant evaluation.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Manay; Patrick Ten Eyck; Roberto Kalil; Melissa Swee; M Lee Sanders; Grace Binns; Jodell L Hornickel; Daniel A Katz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.982

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.