Literature DB >> 8817318

Interaural time and level differences: integrated or separated processing?

E Schröger1.   

Abstract

The processing of internal differences in time (IDT) and sound pressure level (IDL) was studied by using the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential (MMN), which is a probe of pre-attentive auditory sensory memory. In a passive oddball experiment, subjects were reading in a book while they were presented with a standard stimulus (P = 0.88) having no IDTs or IDLs and three different deviant stimuli revealing an IDT, IDL, or both IDT and IDL. The different deviants elicited MMNs of comparable latencies indicating that memory representations of the IDTs and IDLs have been established. The MMN amplitudes to the IDT-IDL deviant were larger than those to changes in either IDT or IDL only. Moreover, the time-courses, amplitudes, and topographies of the MMNs to the IDT-IDL deviants were very similar to the sum of the MMNs elicited by the IDT and IDL deviants. These findings suggest that the representations of the binaural location cues were (at least partly) processed in parallel. It is argued that separate azimuth representations exist for IDT and IDL at a cortical level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817318     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00066-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  23 in total

1.  Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization.

Authors:  J Kaiser; W Lutzenberger; H Preissl; H Ackermann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of the azimuthal position of stationary and moving sound images on the mismatch negativity phenomenon.

Authors:  L B Shestopalova; S F Vaitulevich
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

4.  A recency effect in sound localization?

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  [Processing of interaural time differences in normal-hearing subjects and cochlear implant users with FSP and HDCIS coding strategy].

Authors:  N Heidekrüger; T Rahne; L Wagner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans.

Authors:  Mikaella Sarrou; Pia Marlena Schmitz; Nicole Hamm; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

10.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.