Literature DB >> 881691

"Independent assessor" and "pooled index" as techniques for measuring treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis.

H A Smythe, A Helewa, C H Goldsmith.   

Abstract

To conduct studies of therapy of rheumatoid patients at the primary care level two new assessment techniques were developed. The "independent assessor" (IA) was a nonmedical person trained to gather information using a questionnaire, a guided count of tender joints, grip strength, and blood tests. The "polled index" was a statistical device for summarizing all abailable information, constructed by transformation of various clinical measures of treatment effects to a common scale, based on standard deviation units. A validation study is reported, which involved 33 rheumatoid patients, each studied by four trained observers plus the IA, before and after 10 days of hospital therapy. Major gains in sensitivity and reliability were achieved by the pooled index. The IAs total assessment provided 84% of the information available in the pooled index, and was more sensitive and reliable than any other single clinical measure. The efficacy of a brief period of hospital therapy for rheumatoid patients was also strikingly demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 881691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  10 in total

1.  Can we develop simple response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs?

Authors:  D L Scott; J E Dacre; A Greenwood; L Treasure; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Dr. Douglas Taylor and half a century of musculoskeletal Kelvinism.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A preliminary evaluation of the dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: the case for standardisation.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Establishment of an index with increased sensitivity for assessing murine arthritis.

Authors:  Erik R Sampson; Christopher A Beck; John Ketz; Krista L Canary; Matthew J Hilton; Hani Awad; Edward M Schwarz; Di Chen; Regis J O'Keefe; Randy N Rosier; Michael J Zuscik
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Responsiveness of the core set, response criteria, and utilities in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A C Verhoeven; M Boers; S van Der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Bruno Amato; Lorenzo Moja; Salvatore Panico; Giovanni Persico; Corrado Rispoli; Nicola Rocco; Ivan Moschetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

8.  Relationship between severity and clinical importance of symptoms in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  N Bellamy; G Wells; J Campbell
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Measurement of global functional performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using rheumatology function tests.

Authors:  Agustín Escalante; Roy W Haas; Inmaculada del Rincón
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  A 4-year non-randomized comparative phase-IV study of early rheumatoid arthritis: integrative anthroposophic medicine for patients with preference against DMARDs versus conventional therapy including DMARDs for patients without preference.

Authors:  Harald J Hamre; Van N Pham; Christian Kern; Rolf Rau; Jörn Klasen; Ute Schendel; Lars Gerlach; Attyla Drabik; Ludger Simon
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.