Literature DB >> 1969728

Can we develop simple response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs?

D L Scott1, J E Dacre, A Greenwood, L Treasure, E C Huskisson.   

Abstract

The conventional assessment of response to slow acting antirheumatic drugs depends on multiple clinical and laboratory measures. Each measure is analysed separately. For clinical practice and therapeutic trials a single unified classification of response is preferable, based on the most sensitive and simple current measures. Whether or not this was practical was determined in a prospective study of two cohorts of patients: 145 given penicillamine 250-500 mg daily in a single dose; 98 sulphasalazine at an initial dose of 500 mg rising after one month to 2 g daily. Both groups were followed up for 12 months. A panel of 11 clinical and laboratory measures were evaluated every three to six months. Most changes had occurred by six months, and this was the optimum time to classify response. Four measures were used to devise a five point (0-4) classification of response from no change to remission. The objective was to evaluate if this approach is appropriate; the best level of each measure to use was not determined. The response index was based on: erythrocyte sedimentation rate less than 30 mm/h; articular index less than 3; morning stiffness less than 15 min; greater than 50% reduction in joint pain. Similar results were obtained with both drugs. The other clinical and laboratory measures gave limited information. This response index is simple and appropriate. It is suitable for use in clinical practice and drug studies, though the optimal values for dividing each clinical and laboratory variable need to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1969728      PMCID: PMC1004023          DOI: 10.1136/ard.49.3.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  13 in total

1.  What are the 'best' measurements for monitoring patients during short-term second-line therapy?

Authors:  J S Dixon; S Hayes; P D Constable; H A Bird
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-02

2.  "Independent assessor" and "pooled index" as techniques for measuring treatment effects in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H A Smythe; A Helewa; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Ranking of laboratory tests by consensus analysis.

Authors:  B S Bull; W C Levy; J C Westengard; M Farr; P F Smith; J F Apperley; P A Bacon; J Stuart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Selection and combination of outcome measures.

Authors:  H A Smythe; A Helewa; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Measurement of rheumatoid factors by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and comparison with other methods.

Authors:  J L Bampton; T E Cawston; M V Kyle; B L Hazleman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Setting the scene and posing the questions.

Authors:  A D Woolf
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1988

7.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales.

Authors:  R F Meenan; P M Gertman; J H Mason
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02

8.  Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R S Pinals; A T Masi; R A Larsen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1981-10

9.  The assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  R K Mallya; B E Mace
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1981-02-01

10.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.

Authors:  J F Fries; P Spitz; R G Kraines; H R Holman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  "Second line" drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R D Sturrock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-07-27

Review 3.  Disease modifying drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: yesterday's treatment today or today's treatment tomorrow?

Authors:  T Pullar
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomics of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Authors:  H A Wynne; M Campbell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Rheumatoid nodules do not predict response to treatment with slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs.

Authors:  G M Hall; A Studnicke; E C Huskisson; D L Scott
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Soluble interleukin-2 receptor in sera and synovial fluids of rheumatoid patients: correlations with disease activity.

Authors:  M Carotti; F Salaffi; G F Ferraccioli; M C Binci; A Sartini; C Cervini
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A A Kalla; A F Tooke; E Bhettay; O L Meyers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.