Literature DB >> 8814681

Cancer genetics clinics: target population and consultees' expectations.

C Julian-Reynier1, F Eisinger, F Chabal, Y Aurran, C Noguès, P Vennin, Y J Bignon, M Machelard-Roumagnac, C Maugard-Louboutin, D Serin, S Versini, M Mercuri, H Sobol.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine in healthy consultees attending cancer genetics clinics their risk status, their pathways leading to the clinics, their expectations and perception of cancer risk. In 1994, the consultees at six French centres completed a questionnaire before their first oncogenetic consultation. The oncogeneticists subsequently filled in a standardised form giving their risk assessment. Among the 206 healthy consultees, 91.3% were women, 92.2% had at least one cancer-affected first-degree relative and 73% had a "cancer family risk" as assessed by the oncogeneticist. Sixty-nine per cent of the consultees were referred to the clinics by a physician, 10.4% by their family and 18.8% on their own initiative: 83.5% of the sample perceived their family risk of cancer as being high and this belief was confirmed in 74.3% of the cases studied by the oncogeneticist. The families of self-referred consultees were less often at risk than those of consultees referred by a physician or by their family (P = 0.012). The majority (78%) expected to be informed about cancer prevention and screening, and this expectation depended on the consultee's level of education (P = 0.001). This study shows that medical pathways are more effective than the media as a means of reaching the members of the general population who are genuinely at risk, and shows that fuller information about prevention needs to be provided at cancer genetic consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8814681     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00601-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of referrals to a multi-disciplinary breast cancer genetics clinic: practical and economic considerations.

Authors:  Marta M Reis; Dorothy Young; Lorna McLeish; David Goudie; Alan Cook; Frank Sullivan; Helen Vysny; Alison Fordyce; Roger Black; Manouche Tavakoli; Michael Steel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling in an Academic Medical Center: Consultands' Satisfaction, Knowledge, and Behavior in the First Year.

Authors:  M Penles Stadler; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Women's Understanding of Their Risk of Developing Breast/Ovarian Cancer Before and After Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Holloway; Mary Porteous; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Robert Rush; Sally Appleton; Dermot Gorman; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Attitudes towards cancer predictive testing and transmission of information to the family.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; F Eisinger; P Vennin; F Chabal; Y Aurran; C Noguès; Y J Bignon; M Machelard-Roumagnac; C Maugard-Louboutin; D Serin; B Blanc; P Orsoni; H Sobol
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Why do women not return family history forms when referred to breast cancer genetics services? A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Kirstie A Hanning; Michael Steel; David Goudie; Lorna McLeish; Jackie Dunlop; Jessica Myring; Frank Sullivan; Jonathan Berg; Gerry Humphris; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Lifestyle changes in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: an observational study.

Authors:  Lorna McLeish; Marta M Reis; Clare Stewart; David R Goudie; Jonathan N Berg; Michelle Harvie; Kirstie A Hanning; Helen Vysny; C Michael Steel
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-12

8.  Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?

Authors:  K Brain; J Gray; P Norman; E Parsons; A Clarke; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Women at risk of ovarian cancer: attitudes towards and expectations of the familial ovarian cancer clinic.

Authors:  R Sheppard; A Fry; R Rush; C M Steel; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Clinical characterization and risk profile of individuals seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Edenir Inez Palmero; Patricia Ashton-Prolla; José Cláudio C da Rocha; Fernando Regla Vargas; Luciane Kalakun; Melissa Brauner Blom; Sérgio J Azevedo; Maira Caleffi; Roberto Giugliani; Lavinia Schüler-Faccini
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.