Literature DB >> 8812025

Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness.

J K Torgesen1, C Davis.   

Abstract

The cognitive abilities that predicted growth in response to a 12-week training program in phonological awareness were investigated with a sample of 100 kindergarten children. The children were selected from two elementary schools with historically low achievement in reading. Sixty children received training in both analytic and synthetic awareness skills, and 40 children constituted a no-treatment control group. Pretest measures included assessment of phonological awareness, phonological memory and naming rate, letter knowledge, reading and spelling, and general verbal ability. Growth in phonological awareness was assessed during the middle and at the end of the training period. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to estimate individual growth curves in phonological awareness for children in both the treatment and control groups. Initial comparisons between children in the two groups indicated substantial overall training effects in phonological awareness for children in the treatment group. For children in the training group, the model that best predicted growth in analytic awareness included invented spelling and general verbal ability, while growth in synthetic awareness was predicted best by a combination of invented spelling and rapid automatic naming of digits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8812025     DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  9 in total

1.  [Auditory processing and perception disorders: proposed treatment and management: guidelines of the German Society for Phoniatry and Pedaudiology].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; A Nickisch; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Morphological Awareness and Children's Writing: Accuracy, Error, and Invention.

Authors:  Deborah McCutchen; Sara Stull
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-02

4.  Understanding Inadequate Response to First Grade Multi-Tier Intervention: Nomothetic and Idiographic Perspectives.

Authors:  Luana Greulich; Stephanie Al Otaiba; Christopher Schatschneider; Jeanne Wanzek; Miriam Ortiz; Richard Wagner
Journal:  Learn Disabil Q       Date:  2014-11

5.  IQ Is Not Strongly Related to Response to Reading Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Interpretation.

Authors:  Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Peter J Molfese; Brandon Weiss; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  2009-10-01

Review 6.  [Guideline: Auditory processing and perception disorders: Proposal for treatment and management of APD : S1 guideline of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; C Kiese-Himmel; K Plotz; A Nickisch; A Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Lisa H Trahan; Radhika R Reddy; Jeremy Miciak; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Rev Educ Res       Date:  2014-11-12

8.  Readiness or Impairment: Cognitive and Linguistic Differences Between Children Who Learn to Read and Those Who Exhibit Difficulties With Reading in Kindergarten Compared to Their Achievements at the End of First Grade.

Authors:  Ariel Ne'eman; Shelley Shaul
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  Mismatch negativity in children with dyslexia speaking Indian languages.

Authors:  Vanaja Chittinahalli Shankarnarayan; Sandeep Maruthy
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.