Literature DB >> 26535015

Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis.

Karla K Stuebing1, Amy E Barth2, Lisa H Trahan3, Radhika R Reddy3, Jeremy Miciak4, Jack M Fletcher5.   

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of 28 studies comprising 39 samples to ask the question, "What is the magnitude of the association between various baseline child cognitive characteristics and response to reading intervention?" Studies were located via literature searches, contact with researchers in the field, and review of references from the National Reading Panel Report. Eligible participant populations included at-risk elementary school children enrolled in the third grade or below. Effects were analyzed using a shifting unit of analysis approach within three statistical models: cognitive characteristics predicting growth curve slope (Model 1, mean r = .31), gain (Model 2, mean r = .21), or postintervention reading controlling for preintervention reading (Model 3, mean r = .15). Effects were homogeneous within each model when effects were aggregated within study. The small size of the effects calls into question the practical significance and utility of using cognitive characteristics for prediction of response when baseline reading is available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meta-analysis; reading disabilities; reading instruction; response to intervention

Year:  2014        PMID: 26535015      PMCID: PMC4628830          DOI: 10.3102/0034654314555996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Educ Res        ISSN: 0034-6543


  31 in total

1.  Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation.

Authors:  B W Wise; J Ring; R K Olson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1999-04

2.  Language deficits in poor comprehenders: a case for the simple view of reading.

Authors:  Hugh W Catts; Suzanne M Adlof; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support programme.

Authors:  Peter J Hatcher; Kristina Goetz; Margaret J Snowling; Charles Hulme; Simon Gibbs; Glynnis Smith
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2006-06

4.  Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch.

Authors:  Femke Scheltinga; Aryan van der Leij; Chris Struiksma
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2009-12-23

Review 5.  Multiple regression in psychological research and practice.

Authors:  R B Darlington
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  On the importance of a cognitive processing perspective: an introduction.

Authors:  Douglas Fuchs; James B Hale; Devin M Kearns
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

7.  Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study.

Authors:  Stephanie Al Otaiba; Douglas Fuchs
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

8.  Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Mark McDaniel; Doug Rohrer; Robert Bjork
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-12-01

9.  Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions.

Authors:  Frank R Vellutino; Donna M Scanlon; Sheila Small; Diane P Fanuele
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

10.  Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Carolyn A Denton; Paul T Cirino; David J Francis; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  School Psych Rev       Date:  2011
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities: The Past and the Future.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Brain activity in struggling readers before intervention relates to future reading gains.

Authors:  Tehila Nugiel; Mary Abbe Roe; W Patrick Taylor; Paul T Cirino; Sharon R Vaughn; Jack M Fletcher; Jenifer Juranek; Jessica A Church
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 3.  Cognitive, Intervention, and Neuroimaging Perspectives on Executive Function in Children With Reading Disabilities.

Authors:  Jessica A Church; Paul T Cirino; Jeremy Miciak; Jenifer Juranek; Sharon Vaughn; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev       Date:  2019-05-02

4.  Is "Response/No Response" Too Simple a Notion for RTI Frameworks? Exploring Multiple Response Types With Latent Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Eunsoo Cho; Amy M Elleman; Devin M Kearns; Samuel Patton; Donald L Compton
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2020-07-04

5.  The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.

Authors:  Sharon Vaughn; Philip Capin; Nancy Scammacca; Greg Roberts; Paul Cirino; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 6.  Comprehensive Cognitive Assessments are not Necessary for the Identification and Treatment of Learning Disabilities.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Jeremy Miciak
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities.

Authors:  Noam Siegelman; Jay G Rueckl; Mark van den Bunt; Jan C Frijters; Jason D Zevin; Maureen W Lovett; Mark S Seidenberg; Kenneth R Pugh; Robin D Morris
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2021-09-23

8.  Cognitive discrepancy models for specific learning disabilities identification: Simulations of psychometric limitations.

Authors:  W Pat Taylor; Jeremy Miciak; Jack M Fletcher; David J Francis
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-08-08

9.  Prefrontal mediation of the reading network predicts intervention response in dyslexia.

Authors:  Katherine S Aboud; Laura A Barquero; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Do Processing Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Predict Differential Treatment Response?

Authors:  Jeremy Miciak; Jacob L Williams; W Pat Taylor; Paul T Cirino; Jack M Fletcher; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.