Literature DB >> 25422532

Understanding Inadequate Response to First Grade Multi-Tier Intervention: Nomothetic and Idiographic Perspectives.

Luana Greulich, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Christopher Schatschneider, Jeanne Wanzek, Miriam Ortiz, Richard Wagner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use a mixed methods approach to learn about inadequate response to a year-long multi-tier RTI model that allowed first-grade students to move up and down tiers. Participants were 156 students who received supplemental intervention services during a larger multi-tier RTI study involving classrooms and 522 students across 10 schools. Findings from an all-subset regression indicate letter word reading, the fluency composite, and blending words explained the most variance (15%) in response among initial skills. Adding additional teacher ratings of behavior and academics, accounted for a small amount of additional variance (3%) in group membership. The ROC curve analysis indicated 87.5% of students were correctly classified, yielding a sensitivity of 85.3 and a specificity of 65.0. Findings from qualitative observations of intervention sessions suggest inadequate responders demonstrated physical and verbal task avoidance and displayed emotions of hopelessness and shame. Implications for practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25422532      PMCID: PMC4240018          DOI: 10.1177/0731948714526999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Disabil Q        ISSN: 0731-9487


  15 in total

1.  Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: what level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?

Authors:  Donald L Compton; Jennifer K Gilbert; Joseph R Jenkins; Douglas Fuchs; Lynn S Fuchs; Eunsoo Cho; Laura A Barquero; Bobette Bouton
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012-04-06

2.  Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade.

Authors:  Rollanda E O'Connor; Kristin R Harty; Deborah Fulmer
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties.

Authors:  Carolyn A Denton; Jack M Fletcher; Jason L Anthony; David J Francis
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Responsiveness-to-intervention: a decade later.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2012 May-Jun

5.  Do Supplemental Remedial Reading Programs Address the Motivational Issues of Struggling Readers? An Analysis of Five Popular Programs.

Authors:  Matthew P Quirk; Paula J Schwanenflugel
Journal:  Read Res Instr       Date:  2004-04-01

6.  Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness.

Authors:  J K Torgesen; C Davis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1996-10

7.  IDENTIFICATION OF READING PROBLEMS IN FIRST GRADE WITHIN A RESPONSE-TO-INTERVENTION FRAMEWORK.

Authors:  Deborah L Speece; Christopher Schatschneider; Rebecca Silverman; Lisa Pericola Case; David H Cooper; Dawn M Jacobs
Journal:  Elem Sch J       Date:  2011-06-01

8.  Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions.

Authors:  Frank R Vellutino; Donna M Scanlon; Sheila Small; Diane P Fanuele
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

9.  Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention.

Authors:  Jack M Fletcher; Karla K Stuebing; Amy E Barth; Carolyn A Denton; Paul T Cirino; David J Francis; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  School Psych Rev       Date:  2011

10.  Categorical and Dimensional Definitions and Evaluations of Symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN Rating Scales.

Authors:  James M Swanson; Sabrina Schuck; Miranda Mann Porter; Caryn Carlson; Catharina A Hartman; Joseph A Sergeant; Walter Clevenger; Michael Wasdell; Richard McCleary; Kimberley Lakes; Timothy Wigal
Journal:  Int J Educ Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing Validity of Measurement in Learning Disabilities Using Hierarchical Generalized Linear Modeling: The Roles of Anxiety and Motivation.

Authors:  Georgios D Sideridis
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Response to Intervention.

Authors:  Stephanie Al Otaiba; Jeanne Wanzek; Paul Yovanoff
Journal:  Eur Sci J       Date:  2015-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.