Literature DB >> 8808967

Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?

P J Gagne1, J Matchett, D MacFarland, M Hauer-Jensen, G W Barone, J F Eidt, R W Barnes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Study (ACAS) both confirmed the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke in patients who have significant carotid stenosis. A uniform technique for measuring carotid stenosis from an arteriogram (% stenosis = [1 - minimum residual lumen/normal distal cervical internal carotid artery diameter] x 100) was used in both trials, with reproducibility internally validated. The reliability of this measurement when used outside the trials for defining carotid stenosis has not been validated. Imprecise calculation of carotid stenosis can result in a 50% overestimation of significant carotid disease and potential overuse of carotid surgery. This is a prospective study of the reliability of carotid stenosis measurements performed by practicing physicians of different specialties and different levels of clinical experience.
METHODS: Two vascular surgeons and two interventional radiologists (one resident and one staff member per specialty), blinded to results, calculated the percent stenosis from 219 consecutive arteriograms performed to evaluate extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease; 72 random films were reread by each individual. The interpretations were grouped as < 60% or > or = 60% stenosis (ACAS) and as < 30%, 30% to 69%, and > or = 70% stenosis (NASCET). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were analyzed with the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: Interobserver reliability in categorizing carotid stenosis revealed excellent agreement for both ACAS (kappa = 0.825 to 0.903) and NASCET groups (kappa = 0.729 to 0.793). Interobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.91 to 0.95. Intraobserver agreement was also highly reproducible for both the ACAS (kappa = 0.732 to 0.970) and NASCET categories (kappa = 0.634 to 0.805). Intraobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.89 to 0.95.
CONCLUSION: The NASCET technique for quantification of carotid stenosis can be easily learned by physicians and reliably implemented for appropriate identification of candidates for carotid endarterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8808967     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70201-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

1.  Measurement error of percent diameter carotid stenosis determined by conventional angiography: implications for noninvasive evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Semi-automated computer assessment of the degree of carotid artery stenosis compares favorably to visual evaluation.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Christine Glastonbury; Elizabeth Tong; Benison C Lau; Sarah Schaeffer; Jeffrey D Chien; Peter J Haar; David Saloner
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods.

Authors:  Gülsüm Kılıçkap; Elif Ergun; Elif Başbay; Pınar Koşar; Uğur Kosar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Impact of Carotid atheroma on cardiovascular risk in Mauritanian hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Sirakhé Camara; Fatimata G Ba; Abderrahmane Hanne; Houleymata Ba; Horma Zein; Sana Ouali; Fatimata Barry; Ahmed Eba
Journal:  Tunis Med       Date:  2022 fevrier

5.  Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow up.

Authors:  G Stankovic; F Liistro; S Moshiri; C Briguori; N Corvaja; G Gimelli; A Chieffo; M Montorfano; L Finci; V Spanos; C Di Mario; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; Michael J Duh; Suzie M El-Saden
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Imaging endpoints of intracranial atherosclerosis using vessel wall MR imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Athanasios Pavlou; Morgan P Burke; Haochang Shou; Kofi-Buaku Atsina; Jiayu Xiao; Laurie A Loevner; David Mankoff; Zhaoyang Fan; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.995

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.