Literature DB >> 21858656

Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods.

Gülsüm Kılıçkap1, Elif Ergun, Elif Başbay, Pınar Koşar, Uğur Kosar.   

Abstract

Purpose is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and Common Carotid (CC) methods, which are used to measure the degree of ICA stenosis, using 64-slice CT angiography and to compare the measurements made by these three methods. 88 cases (111 carotid arteries) were included in the study. Carotid CTA was performed by a 64 slice scanner (Toshiba, Aqullion 64).Two radiologists measured the degree of carotid stenosis by using NASCET, ECST and CC methods. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of each method was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and kappa and linear weighted kappa statistics. The relation between the measurements was assessed by correlation coefficient (with linear and quadratic methods). Correlation coefficients showed that there is linear correlation between the measurements made by the three methods. The degree of stenosis measured with the NASCET method had the lowest value, while the corresponding values measured with the ECST and CC methods were close to each other. ICC and Bland-Altman plots showed high intra and inter observer agreement for NASCET, ECST and CC methods whereas kappa statistics showed moderate to substantial agreement. CC method had slightly higher agreement when compared with the other two methods. Intra and interobserver agreement is high for NASCET, ECST and CC methods however CC method has a slightly higher reproducibility. There is linear correlation between the measurements made by the three methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21858656     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9939-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  I N Staikov; M Arnold; H P Mattle; L Remonda; M Sturzenegger; R W Baumgartner; G Schroth
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Imaging of the carotid arteries: the role of duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance arteriography, and computerized tomographic arteriography.

Authors:  Michael R Jaff; Gregory V Goldmakher; Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?

Authors:  P J Gagne; J Matchett; D MacFarland; M Hauer-Jensen; G W Barone; J F Eidt; R W Barnes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Utility of magnetic resonance angiography and carotid ultrasound in the evaluation of carotid stenosis.

Authors:  J L Frey; J Heiserman; E K Fram; D Strava
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; R F Smith; N Singh; D W Holdsworth; A J Fox; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  MDCTA of carotid plaque degree of stenosis: evaluation of interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Giorgio Mallarini
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  S G Patel; D A Collie; J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; A R Wright; R J Gibson; R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproducibility of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Measurements by DSA: Comparison of the NASCET and WASID Methods.

Authors:  Luguang Chen; Qian Zhan; Chao Ma; Qi Liu; Xuefeng Zhang; Xia Tian; Yuanliang Jiang; Yinmei Dong; Shiyue Chen; Jianping Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.