Literature DB >> 8808040

Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers.

S J Reynolds1, K J Donham, P Whitten, J A Merchant, L F Burmeister, W J Popendorf.   

Abstract

Studies describing respiratory health hazards for workers in swine production facilities have been published in the United States, Sweden, Canada, the Netherlands, and Denmark. Up to 50% of these workers experience bronchitis, organic dust toxic syndrome, hyper-reactive airways disease, chronic mucous membrane irritation, and other respiratory effects. These studies clearly point to the fact that this occupational environment poses a significant health risk hazard, and that control methods are needed to protect the worker. Before precise control strategies can be developed, implemented, and evaluated, dose-response studies are required to determine acceptable target levels for exposure. A previous manuscript described the development of multiple regression equations characterizing the relationships between environmental exposures and pulmonary response in a cohort of 207 swine producers. Baseline pulmonary function was included as a significant predictor of cross-shift decrements in pulmonary function in addition to personal measurements of dust, endotoxin, and ammonia concentrations. These equations were then used to predict specific exposure levels of dust and ammonia that could be expected to elicit significant decrements in cross-shift pulmonary function. This paper presents the results from analysis of follow-up data obtained on this same cohort 2 years after the initial measurements. At the second measurement period of the study (time-2), swine workers were found to have a mean cross-shift decrease in FEV1 of 2%. Cross-shift change in FEV1 was significantly correlated with personal exposures to total dust, total endotoxin, respirable endotoxin, and ammonia. The magnitude of the decrease in FEV1 was associated with increasing airborne concentrations of these environmental parameters thus confirming the dose-response relationship observed in the initial study (time-1). The correlation of dust with FEV1 changes in workers with more than 6 years of exposure (time-1 data) and more than 10 years of exposure (time-2 data) suggests that dust exposure is an important factor in chronic respiratory disease. Additionally, the correlation of endotoxins with FEV1 changes in the group with less than 6 years exposure (time-2 data) suggests endotoxins may have more significance for subacute respiratory effects. The agreement between observed cross-shift FEV1 changes measured in time-2 with changes predicted using regression equations derived from time-1 data demonstrates a consistent dose-response relationship over time for this cohort of swine production workers. This finding provides further support for conclusions of the previous study that levels of 2.5 mg/m3 (total dust) and 7.5 ppm (ammonia) are reasonable guidelines for occupational exposure limits in this environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8808040     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199601)29:1<33::AID-AJIM5>3.0.CO;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  29 in total

1.  Short term exposure to airborne microbial agents during farm work: exposure-response relations with eye and respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  W Eduard; J Douwes; R Mehl; D Heederik; E Melbostad
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Ambient Ammonia Exposures in an Agricultural Community and Pediatric Asthma Morbidity.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Michael Yost; Paul Sampson; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Victoria Breckwich Vasquez; Kris Hartin; Jenna Armstrong; Maria Tchong-French; Sverre Vedal; Parveen Bhatti; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Assessment of swine worker exposures to dust and endotoxin during hog load-out and power washing.

Authors:  Patrick O'Shaughnessy; Thomas Peters; Kelley Donham; Craig Taylor; Ralph Altmaier; Kevin Kelly
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-03-16

6.  Evaluation of the Limulus amebocyte lysate and recombinant factor C assays for assessment of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  Peter S Thorne; Sarah S Perry; Rena Saito; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; John Mehaffy; Nervana Metwali; Thomas Keefe; Kelley J Donham; Stephen J Reynolds
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Assessment of Interventions to Improve Air Quality in a Livestock Building.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Anthony Y Yang; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2017-11-20

8.  Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.

Authors:  Peter S Thorne; Anne C Ansley; Sarah Spencer Perry
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Modeled effectiveness of ventilation with contaminant control devices on indoor air quality in a swine farrowing facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  Influence of farming exposure on the development of asthma and asthma-like symptoms.

Authors:  Adam D Wells; Jill A Poole; Debra J Romberger
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.