Literature DB >> 8807062

Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in critically ill patients.

F Bressolle1, A Gouby, J M Martinez, P Joubert, G Saissi, R Guillaud, R Gomeni.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were determined in a population of 20 adults and 36 pediatric patients admitted into an intensive care unit. Amikacin was administered by repeated intravenous infusion over 0.5 h (600 to 1,350 mg for adults; 70 to 1,500 mg for children). The number of administrations ranged from 2 to 17, and the number of samples collected from each patient ranged from 2 to 70. The population enrolled in the study had large variabilities in age (0.5 to 85 years), weight (6 to 95 kg), height (72 to 187 cm), creatinine clearance rate (18 to 110 ml/min), blood urea nitrogen concentration (1.5 to 15 mmol/liter), and total protein concentration (30 to 91 g/liter). The mean population parameters and their interindividual variabilities were obtained for an initial group of 44 patients (16 adults and 28 children). A two-compartment model was fitted to the population data by using the computer program P-PHARM. Model selection was guided by evaluation of the minimum objective function and the weighted residuals. The population analysis has been performed with the complete set of the collected data, including the individual serum amikacin concentration together with the individual estimate of the creatinine clearance values. The potential sources of variability in the population parameters were investigated by using patients' age, height, weight, creatinine clearance, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and total protein concentration as covariables. A test group of 12 additional patients (4 adults and 8 children) was used to evaluate the predictive performances of the population parameters. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by a Bayesian fitting procedure. From the resulting individualized values of the parameters, the concentrations of amikacin in the serum of the patients were calculated. To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian estimation, the experimental concentrations were compared with the predicted ones. The Bayesian approached developed in the study accurately predicts amikacin concentrations in serum and allows for the estimation of amikacin pharmacokinetics parameters, minimizing the risk of bias in the prediction. This was demonstrated in patients with both stable and unstable renal functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807062      PMCID: PMC163395     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling: the importance of informative graphics.

Authors:  E I Ette; T M Ludden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Evaluation of a Bayesian method of amikacin dosing in intensive care unit patients with normal or impaired renal function.

Authors:  B Lacarelle; C Granthil; J C Manelli; N Bruder; G Francois; J P Cano
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  A Bayesian feedback method of aminoglycoside dosing.

Authors:  M E Burton; D C Brater; P S Chen; R B Day; P J Huber; M R Vasko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Comparison of methods for estimating gentamicin clearance and retrospective analysis of changes in clearance with emphasis on patients with normal renal function.

Authors:  P G Davey; A M Geddes; I Gonda; E S Harpur; D K Scott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

7.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-10

8.  Clinical response to aminoglycoside therapy: importance of the ratio of peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  R D Moore; P S Lietman; C R Smith
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Comparison of methods of estimating creatinine clearance in children.

Authors:  S L Traub; C E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1980-02

10.  Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in 1,640 patients: method for control of serum concentrations.

Authors:  D E Zaske; R J Cipolle; J C Rotschafer; L D Solem; N R Mosier; R G Strate
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Stephanie Läer; John C Panetta; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Interethnic differences in pharmacokinetics of antibacterials.

Authors:  Danny Tsai; Janattul-Ain Jamal; Joshua S Davis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.

Authors:  Amélie Marsot; Romain Guilhaumou; Camille Riff; Olivier Blin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Optimizing Amikacin Dosage in Pediatrics Based on Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Saeed Alqahtani; Manal Abouelkheir; Abdullah Alsultan; Yasmine Elsharawy; Aljawharah Alkoraishi; Reem Osman; Wael Mansy
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Relative pharmacokinetics of three amikacin brands in onco-hemotologic pediatric patients experiencing febrile neutropeina.

Authors:  Muhammad Jamshaid; Samia Yousuf; Nadeem Irfan Bukhari; Amir Ali Rizvi
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Correlation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin and ceftazidime.

Authors:  Duangchit Panomvana; Sam-Ang Kiatjaroensin; Danabhand Phiboonbanakit
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Aminoglycosides in septic shock: an overview, with specific consideration given to their nephrotoxic risk.

Authors:  Alexandre Boyer; Didier Gruson; Stéphane Bouchet; Benjamin Clouzeau; Bui Hoang-Nam; Frédéric Vargas; Hilbert Gilles; Mathieu Molimard; Anne-Marie Rogues; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Study of relationship between volume of distribution and body weight application to amikacin.

Authors:  L Rughoo; L Bourguignon; P Maire; M Ducher
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.441

10.  Influence of clinical diagnosis in the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  S Romano; M Del Mar Fdez de Gatta; V Calvo; E Mendez; A Domínguez-Gil; J M Lanao
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.