Literature DB >> 18370499

Influence of clinical diagnosis in the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit patients.

S Romano1, M Del Mar Fdez de Gatta, V Calvo, E Mendez, A Domínguez-Gil, J M Lanao.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse the pharmacokinetic behaviour of amikacin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients using a mixed-effect model and sparse data collected during routine clinical care. The patient population comprised 158 medical ICU patients divided into two groups: one for computing the population model (n = 120) and the other for validation (n = 38). A 1-compartment model was used and the following covariates were tested for their influence on clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd): age, gender, weight, parenteral nutrition, creatinine clearance, duration of therapy and clinical diagnosis. The nonlinear mixed-effect model (NONMEM) was used to assess the population pharmacokinetic model of amikacin in this patient population. In this study, the final population model accounting for amikacin pharmacokinetics in ICU patients was: CL = 0.93 CL(CR) (1 + 0.22 Trauma), Vd = 0.39 TBW (1 + 0.24 Sepsis), where CL(CR) and TBW corresponded to the patients' creatinine clearance and total bodyweight, respectively. The 'Trauma' and 'Sepsis' variables referred to the clinical diagnosis of the patients. This model was subsequently used to predict amikacin serum levels obtained in the validation population by a priori and Bayesian methods. The predictive performance was adequate for clinical purposes, pointing to the feasibility of our population model to provide reference values for a priori prediction as well as the Bayesian approach for individualisation of amikacin therapy in ICU patients.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18370499     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199815050-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  27 in total

1.  Amikacin Bayesian forecasting in critically ill patients with sepsis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  G Lugo; G Castañeda-Hernández
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Fluctuation of the volume of distribution of amikacin and its effect on once-daily dosage and clearance in a seriously ill patient.

Authors:  F J Botha; P van der Bijl; H I Seifart; D P Parkin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: the average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.

Authors:  P O Maitre; S Vozeh; J Heykants; D A Thomson; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Inadequacy of standard aminoglycoside loading doses in acutely ill patients.

Authors:  L Chelluri; M S Jastremski
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The association of aminoglycoside plasma levels with mortality in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

Authors:  R D Moore; C R Smith; P S Lietman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-04

8.  Association of aminoglycoside plasma levels with therapeutic outcome in gram-negative pneumonia.

Authors:  R D Moore; C R Smith; P S Lietman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Effect of altered volume of distribution on aminoglycoside levels in patients in surgical intensive care.

Authors:  P W Niemiec; M D Allo; C F Miller
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-02

10.  Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit patients studied by NPEM algorithm.

Authors:  J Debord; C Pessis; J C Voultoury; P Marquet; H Lotfi; L Merle; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.748

View more
  11 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Aaron J Heffernan; Fekade B Sime; Derek S Sarovich; Michael Neely; Yarmarly Guerra-Valero; Saiyuri Naicker; Kyra Cottrell; Patrick Harris; Katherine T Andrews; David Ellwood; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Keith Grimwood; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Sílvia M Illamola; Hoa Q Huynh; Xiaoxi Liu; Zubin N Bhakta; Catherine M Sherwin; Theodore G Liou; Holly Carveth; David C Young
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.

Authors:  Amélie Marsot; Romain Guilhaumou; Camille Riff; Olivier Blin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of single-dose amikacin in critically ill patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  C Burdet; O Pajot; C Couffignal; L Armand-Lefèvre; A Foucrier; C Laouénan; M Wolff; L Massias; F Mentré
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin-Tazobactam/Amikacin Combination versus Meropenem against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Kamrul Islam; Fekade B Sime; Steven C Wallis; Michelle J Bauer; Saiyuri Naicker; Hayoung Won; Hosam M Zowawi; Md Abu Choudhury; Tahmina Shirin; Zakir H Habib; Patrick N A Harris; Meerjady S Flora; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.938

6.  Population Pharmacokinetic Study of the Suitability of Standard Dosing Regimens of Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients with Open-Abdomen and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Cédric Carrié; Faustine Delzor; Stéphanie Roure; Vincent Dubuisson; Laurent Petit; Mathieu Molimard; Dominique Breilh; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin Administered Once Daily in Patients with Different Renal Functions.

Authors:  Norma A Aréchiga-Alvarado; Susanna E Medellín-Garibay; Rosa Del C Milán-Segovia; Arturo Ortiz-Álvarez; Martín Magaña-Aquino; Silvia Romano-Moreno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Amparo Sánchez Navarro; Clara-Isabel Colino Gandarillas; Francisco Alvarez Lerma; Y Alcalde Menacho; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.577

9.  Predictors of insufficient peak amikacin concentration in critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Cyril Touchard; Alexandra Aubry; Philippine Eloy; Nicolas Bréchot; Guillaume Lebreton; Guillaume Franchineau; Sebastien Besset; Guillaume Hékimian; Ania Nieszkowska; Pascal Leprince; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Alain Combes; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Minyon L Avent; Kate L McCarthy; Fekade B Sime; Saiyuri Naicker; Aaron J Heffernan; Steven C Wallis; David L Paterson; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.