Literature DB >> 3617153

Evaluation of a Bayesian method of amikacin dosing in intensive care unit patients with normal or impaired renal function.

B Lacarelle, C Granthil, J C Manelli, N Bruder, G Francois, J P Cano.   

Abstract

Our study was designed to determine the population pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin in intensive care unit patients and to develop a Bayesian method allowing individual estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters. A two-stage method was used for estimating the population characteristics of the pharmacokinetic parameters. Calculations of optimum doses and dosing intervals were based on individual parameters. Our results indicate that the Bayesian method is capable of estimating the individual pharmacokinetic parameters with no significant bias and good precision. Individualization of amikacin dosage was assessed 70 times in 52 patients. To determine the predictive performance of the method, observed peak and trough levels were compared with predicted values by computing precision, bias, and correlation. The amikacin dosing method was unbiased and showed a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.962) between measured and predicted drug serum concentrations. No significant differences were found between the predicted and observed peak (17.3 +/- 3.5 and 17.3 +/- 3.8 micrograms/ml, respectively) and trough (2.86 +/- 0.93 and 3.08 +/- 1.41 micrograms/ml, respectively) amikacin serum concentrations. Among the 52 patients, wide variations were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters (Vd = 0.21-0.50 L/kg; t 1/2 = 1.1-22 h) and the daily doses (2.8-42 mg/kg/day).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3617153     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198706000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A H Thomson; B Whiting
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Renal elimination of amikacin and the aging process.

Authors:  M Ducher; P Maire; C Cerutti; Y Bourhis; F Foltz; P Sorensen; R Jelliffe; J P Fauvel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in critically ill patients.

Authors:  F Bressolle; A Gouby; J M Martinez; P Joubert; G Saissi; R Guillaud; R Gomeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  An updated comparison of drug dosing methods. Part III: Aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  S M Erdman; K A Rodvold; R D Pryka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Comparison of Sawchuk-Zaske and Bayesian forecasting for aminoglycosides in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  C P Denaro; P J Ravenscroft
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Aminoglycoside forecasting in neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  J L Kosirog; R M Rospond; C Destache; P Hall
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Aminoglycosides in septic shock: an overview, with specific consideration given to their nephrotoxic risk.

Authors:  Alexandre Boyer; Didier Gruson; Stéphane Bouchet; Benjamin Clouzeau; Bui Hoang-Nam; Frédéric Vargas; Hilbert Gilles; Mathieu Molimard; Anne-Marie Rogues; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Practical computer-assisted dosing for aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Authors:  L A Lenert; H Klostermann; R W Coleman; J Lurie; T F Blaschke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A population approach to the forecasting of amikacin plasma and urinary levels using a prescribed dosage regimen.

Authors:  P Joubert; F Bressolle; A Gouby; P Y Douçot; G Saissi; R Gomeni
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.569

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.