Literature DB >> 8800982

Early continuous ST segment monitoring in unstable angina: prognostic value additional to the clinical characteristics and the admission electrocardiogram.

D J Patel1, D R Holdright, C J Knight, D Mulcahy, B Thakrar, C Wright, J Sparrow, M Wicks, W Hubbard, R Thomas, G C Sutton, G Hendry, H Purcell, K Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: In unstable angina, clinical characteristics, resting electrocardiography, and early continuous ST segment monitoring have been individually reported to identify subgroups at increased risk of adverse outcome. It is not known, however, whether continuous ST monitoring provides additional prognostic information in such a setting.
DESIGN: Observational study of 212 patients with unstable angina without evidence of acute myocardial infarction admitted to district general hospitals, who had participated in a randomised study comparing heparin and aspirin treatment versus aspirin alone.
METHODS: Clinical variables and a 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded at admission, and treatment was standardised to include aspirin, atenolol, diltiazem, and intravenous glyceryl trinitrate, in addition to intravenous heparin (randomised treatment). Continuous ST segment monitoring was performed for 48 h and all inhospital adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS: The admission ECG was normal in 61 patients (29%), showed ST depression in 59 (28%) (17 > or = 0.1 mV), and T wave changes in a further 69 (33%). The remaining 23 had Q waves (18), right bundle branch block (four), or ST elevation (one). During 8963 h of continuous ST segment monitoring (mean 42.3 h/patient), 132 episodes of transient myocardial ischaemia (104 silent) were recorded in 32 patients (15%). Forty patients (19%) had an adverse event (cardiac deaths (n = 3), non-fatal myocardial infarction (n = 6) and, emergency revascularisation (n = 31)). Both admission ECG ST depression (P = 0.02), and transient ischaemia (P < 0.001) predicted an increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction or death, while no patients with a normal ECG died or had a myocardial infarction. Adverse outcome was predicted by admission ECG ST depression (regardless of severity) (odds ratio (OR) 3.41) (P < 0.001), and maintenance beta blocker treatment (OR 2.95) (P < 0.01). A normal ECG predicted a favourable outcome (OR 0.38) (P = 0.04), while T wave or other ECG changes were not predictive of outcome. Transient ischaemia was the strongest predictor of adverse prognosis (OR 4.61) (P < 0.001), retaining independent predictive value in multivariate analysis (OR 2.94) (P = 0.03), as did maintenance beta blocker treatment (OR 2.85) (P = 0.01) and admission ECG ST depression, which showed a trend towards independent predictive value (OR 2.11) (P = 0.076).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unstable angina and a normal admission ECG have a good prognosis, while ST segment depression predicts an adverse outcome. Transient myocardial ischaemia detected by continuous ST segment monitoring in such patients receiving optimal medical treatment provides prognostic information additional to that gleaned from the clinical characteristics or the admission ECG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8800982      PMCID: PMC484276          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.75.3.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  18 in total

1.  Preinfarctional (unstable) angina--a prospective study--ten year follow-up. Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic changes.

Authors:  P C Gazes; E M Mobley; H M Faris; R C Duncan; G B Humphries
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C de Zwaan; F W Bär; H J Wellens
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Anatomic and prognostic significance of new T-wave inversion in unstable angina.

Authors:  D E Haines; D S Raabe; W D Gundel; F J Wackers
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina. Results of a Canadian multicenter trial.

Authors:  J A Cairns; M Gent; J Singer; K J Finnie; G M Froggatt; D A Holder; G Jablonsky; W J Kostuk; L J Melendez; M G Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Nifedipine and conventional therapy for unstable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind comparison.

Authors:  J E Muller; Z G Turi; D L Pearle; J F Schneider; D H Serfas; J Morrison; P H Stone; R E Rude; B Rosner; B E Sobel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Natural history and prognosis of unstable angina.

Authors:  R Mulcahy; A H Al Awadhi; M de Buitleor; G Tobin; H Johnson; R Contoy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina.

Authors:  S O Gottlieb; M L Weisfeldt; P Ouyang; E D Mellits; G Gerstenblith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The basal electrocardiogram and the exercise stress test in assessing prognosis in patients with unstable angina.

Authors:  S Severi; E Orsini; P Marraccini; C Michelassi; A L'Abbate
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Prognostic implications of transient--predominantly silent--ischaemia in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  T von Arnim; H W Gerbig; W Krawietz; B Höfling
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Comparison of the effect of heparin and aspirin versus aspirin alone on transient myocardial ischemia and in-hospital prognosis in patients with unstable angina.

Authors:  D Holdright; D Patel; D Cunningham; R Thomas; W Hubbard; G Hendry; G Sutton; K Fox
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Acute coronary syndromes: risk stratification.

Authors:  A Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Prognostic value of continuous ST-segment monitoring in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Carlos Aguiar; Jorge Ferreira; Ricardo Seabra-Gomes
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  [Acute coronary syndrome in the prehospital phase].

Authors:  J-H Schiff; H R Arntz; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores?

Authors:  Pedro Carmo; Jorge Ferreira; Carlos Aguiar; António Ferreira; Luís Raposo; Pedro Gonçalves; João Brito; Aniceto Silva
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Observer variability and optimal criteria of transient ischemia during ST monitoring with continuous 12-lead ECG.

Authors:  Tomas Jernberg; Jörgen Cronblad; Bertil Lindahl; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Vectorcardiography risk stratifies emergency department chest pain patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on the initial 12-lead ECG.

Authors:  Francis M Fesmire; Sven V Eriksson
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Prehospital electrocardiographic manifestations of acute myocardial ischemia independently predict adverse hospital outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica K Zègre Hemsey; Kathleen Dracup; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Claire E Sommargren; Steven M Paul; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Can C reactive protein or troponins T and I predict outcome in patients with intractable unstable angina?

Authors:  N P Curzen; D J Patel; M Kemp; J Hooper; C J Knight; D Clarke; C Wright; K M Fox
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.994

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.