BACKGROUND: Prehospital electrocardiography (PH ECG) is becoming the standard of care for patients activating Emergency Medical Services for symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Little is known about the prognostic value of ischemia found on PH ECG. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether manifestations of acute myocardial ischemia on PH ECG are predictive of adverse hospital outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of all PH ECGs recorded in 630 patients who called 911 for symptoms of ACS and were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial. ST-segment monitoring software was added to the PH ECG device with automatic storage and transmission of ECGs to the destination Emergency Department. Patient medical records were reviewed for adverse hospital outcomes. RESULTS: In 630 patients who called 911 for ACS symptoms, 270 (42.9%) had PH ECG evidence of ischemia. Overall, 37% of patients with PH ECG ischemia had adverse hospital outcomes compared with 27% of patients without PH ECG ischemia (p < 0.05). Those with PH ECG ischemia were 1.55 times more likely to have adverse hospital outcomes than those without PH ECG ischemia (95% CI 1.09-2.21; p < 0.05), after controlling for other predictors of adverse hospital outcomes (i.e., age, sex, and medical history). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of ischemia on PH ECG is an independent predictor of adverse hospital outcomes. ST-segment monitoring in the prehospital setting can identify high-risk patients with symptoms of ACS and provide important prognostic information at presentation to the Emergency Department. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Prehospital electrocardiography (PH ECG) is becoming the standard of care for patients activating Emergency Medical Services for symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Little is known about the prognostic value of ischemia found on PH ECG. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether manifestations of acute myocardial ischemia on PH ECG are predictive of adverse hospital outcomes. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of all PH ECGs recorded in 630 patients who called 911 for symptoms of ACS and were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial. ST-segment monitoring software was added to the PH ECG device with automatic storage and transmission of ECGs to the destination Emergency Department. Patient medical records were reviewed for adverse hospital outcomes. RESULTS: In 630 patients who called 911 for ACS symptoms, 270 (42.9%) had PH ECG evidence of ischemia. Overall, 37% of patients with PH ECG ischemia had adverse hospital outcomes compared with 27% of patients without PH ECG ischemia (p < 0.05). Those with PH ECG ischemia were 1.55 times more likely to have adverse hospital outcomes than those without PH ECG ischemia (95% CI 1.09-2.21; p < 0.05), after controlling for other predictors of adverse hospital outcomes (i.e., age, sex, and medical history). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of ischemia on PH ECG is an independent predictor of adverse hospital outcomes. ST-segment monitoring in the prehospital setting can identify high-risk patients with symptoms of ACS and provide important prognostic information at presentation to the Emergency Department. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: John M Field; Mary Fran Hazinski; Michael R Sayre; Leon Chameides; Stephen M Schexnayder; Robin Hemphill; Ricardo A Samson; John Kattwinkel; Robert A Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Diana M Cave; Edward C Jauch; Peter J Kudenchuk; Robert W Neumar; Mary Ann Peberdy; Jeffrey M Perlman; Elizabeth Sinz; Andrew H Travers; Marc D Berg; John E Billi; Brian Eigel; Robert W Hickey; Monica E Kleinman; Mark S Link; Laurie J Morrison; Robert E O'Connor; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Brett Cucchiara; Jeffrey D Ferguson; Thomas D Rea; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barbara J Drew; Claire E Sommargren; Daniel M Schindler; Kent Benedict; Jessica Zegre-Hemsey; James P Glancy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Barbara J Drew; Elise D Dempsey; Tae H Joo; Claire E Sommargren; James P Glancy; Kent Benedict; Mitchell W Krucoff Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: D J Patel; D R Holdright; C J Knight; D Mulcahy; B Thakrar; C Wright; J Sparrow; M Wicks; W Hubbard; R Thomas; G C Sutton; G Hendry; H Purcell; K Fox Journal: Heart Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: D Brieger; K A A Fox; G Fitzgerald; K A Eagle; A Budaj; A Avezum; C B Granger; B Costa; F A Anderson; Ph G Steg Journal: Heart Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Josephine Asafu-Adjei; Antonio Fernandez; Jane Brice Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Melanie Hogg; Jamie Crandell; Michele M Pelter; Len Gettes; Eugene H Chung; David Pearson; Pilar Tochiki; Jonathan R Studnek; Wayne Rosamond Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 1.438