Literature DB >> 6365349

Nifedipine and conventional therapy for unstable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind comparison.

J E Muller, Z G Turi, D L Pearle, J F Schneider, D H Serfas, J Morrison, P H Stone, R E Rude, B Rosner, B E Sobel.   

Abstract

To characterize the potential of nifedipine in the therapy of unstable angina pectoris we implemented a blinded, randomly assigned, titrated schedule of conventional therapy (propranolol, if not contraindicated, and isosorbide dinitrate) or nifedipine for 14 days in 126 patients hospitalized in a coronary care unit for ischemic chest pain of less than 45 min duration. There were no significant differences between conventionally and nifedipine-treated patients with regard to (1) the time to relief of pain as judged by life table analysis, (2) the decrease in anginal attacks per 24 hr from day 0 to day 2 (-2.5 +/- 0.4 for conventional therapy vs; -2.8 +/- 0.3 for nifedipine), (3) the decrease in the number of nitroglycerin tablets consumed per 24 hr (-2.0 +/- 0.5 for conventional vs -2.1 +/- 0.4 for nifedipine therapy), (4) the percentage of patients requiring morphine on day 1 (13% for conventional vs 21% for nifedipine therapy), or (5) the percentage of patients who developed infarction (14% in both groups). Among the 27 patients who did not respond to initial conventional (n = 13) or nifedipine therapy (n = 14), five in each group became pain free when the opposite therapy (either nifedipine or conventional therapy) was added. In the subgroup of 67 patients who were receiving propranolol before randomization, addition of nifedipine was more effective in controlling pain than was an increase in conventional therapy (p = .026). In the subgroup of 59 patients not receiving prior propranolol, initiation of conventional therapy produced more rapid pain relief than initiation of nifedipine therapy alone (p less than .001), which tended to increase heart rate. Thus, for the study population as a whole therapy with nifedipine alone was equivalent to conventional therapy for unstable angina, although this overall equivalence may result from a combination of superiority of nifedipine therapy in patients previously receiving beta-blocker therapy and superiority of beta-blocker therapy in patients not previously receiving beta-blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6365349     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.69.4.728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

Review 1.  Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Nifedipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; S P Clissold; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Recognition and treatment of unstable angina.

Authors:  C Brunelli; P Spallarossa; P Rossettin; S Caponnetto
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Changing patterns in drug therapy for ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  M G Myers
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Recent advances in drug therapy for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D D Waters
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy: Are some of them misleading?

Authors:  E Grossman; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Unstable angina: 1985 update.

Authors:  J A Cairns
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview.

Authors:  P H Held; S Yusuf; C D Furberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-11

9.  Coronary vasomotor and clinical effects of nifedipine in effort, mixed and Prinzmental angina.

Authors:  A Polese; N De Cesare; A Bartorelli; F Fabbiocchi; A Loaldi; P Montorsi; M D Guazzi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1988

Review 10.  Use of nitrates in the treatment of unstable and variant angina.

Authors:  R Nordlander
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.