Literature DB >> 8799270

Improved method of detection of testosterone abuse by gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry analysis of urinary steroids.

R Aguilera1, M Becchi, H Casabianca, C K Hatton, D H Catlin, B Starcevic, H G Pope.   

Abstract

The current approach to detection of doping with testosterone is based on measuring the testosterone to epitestosterone ratio (T/E) in urine by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The median T/E for healthy males who have not used T is about 1.0. In a single urine, a T/E lower than six leads to a negative report even though it does not exclude T administration. A value greater than six indicates possible T administration or a naturally elevated ratio. It has been shown previously that the carbon isotope ratio of urinary T changes after T administration. In this study a potential confirmation method for T abuse was optimized. Gas chromatography/combustion/carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) was used to analyze two T precursors (cholesterol and 5-androsten-3 beta, 17 beta-diol) and two T metabolites (5 alpha- and 5 beta-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diol) in addition to T itself in each of 25 blind urines collected from eight healthy men before, during or after T administration. The carbon isotope ratios of T and the metabolites were lower after T administration. The relationships among the variables were studied using multivariate analysis and beginning with principal components analysis; cluster analysis revealed that the data are composed of two clusters, and classified the samples obtained after T administration in one cluster and the remainder in the other; discriminant analysis correctly identified T users. The measurement of carbon isotope ratios of urinary androgens is comparable to the T/E > 6 test and continues to show promise for resolving cases where doping with T is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799270     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199602)31:2<169::AID-JMS276>3.0.CO;2-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1076-5174            Impact factor:   1.982


  10 in total

1.  Application of high-precision isotope ratio monitoring mass spectrometry to identify the biosynthetic origins of proteins.

Authors:  I Apostol; P D Brooks; A J Mathews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Significance of 19-norandrosterone in athletes' urine samples.

Authors:  C Ayotte
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  The analysis and utilization of cycling training data.

Authors:  Simon A Jobson; Louis Passfield; Greg Atkinson; Gabor Barton; Philip Scarf
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Determination of carbon isotope ratios in amino acids, proteins, and oligosaccharides by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Elise T Luong; R S Houk
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Highly sensitive and selective analysis of urinary steroids by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography combined with positive chemical ionization quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Herbert J Tobias; J Thomas Brenna
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  Detection of synthetic testosterone use by novel comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Herbert J Tobias; Ying Zhang; Richard J Auchus; J Thomas Brenna
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Banned drugs in sport. Does the International Olympic Committee (IOC) list need updating?

Authors:  D R Mottram
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Anabolic steroid use: patterns of use and detection of doping.

Authors:  Michael R Graham; Bruce Davies; Fergal M Grace; Andrew Kicman; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Update on nandrolone and norsteroids: how endogenous or xenobiotic are these substances?

Authors:  V Bricout; F Wright
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Confounding factors and genetic polymorphism in the evaluation of individual steroid profiling.

Authors:  Tiia Kuuranne; Martial Saugy; Norbert Baume
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 13.800

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.