Literature DB >> 8798352

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly.

C M Lo1, E C Lai, S T Fan, C L Liu, J Wong.   

Abstract

This study reviewed the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Among 557 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 70 (12.6%) had a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis confirmed by ultrasonography. There were 28 men and 42 women with a mean age of 59.9 years (range 20-87 years). Thirty patients >/= 65 years of age were compared to 40 patients < 65 years old. Elderly patients had a higher female predominance (p < 0.05), a higher incidence of intercurrent diseases (p < 0.05), and a higher serum urea level (p < 0.001). The proportions of patients who underwent early or delayed surgery were comparable. There was no difference in operation time, postoperative analgesic requirements, or complications. Elderly patients, however, had a significantly higher conversion rate (23.3% versus 2.5%;p < 0.05). Even after successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was a longer delay before ambulation (p < 0.05) and resumption of normal diet (p = 0. 08) with resulting prolonged postoperative (p = 0.08) and total hospital stay (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe, effective treatment for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. When compared to younger patients, elderly patients are at greater risk for conversion, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798352     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Ronnie T P Poon; Wing Chiu Dai; Kenneth S H Chok; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Amitai Bickel; Rotem Sivan Hoffman; Norman Loberant; Michael Weiss; Arieh Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  Y-C Wang; H-R Yang; P-K Chung; L-B Jeng; R-J Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  PREOP-Gallstones: A Prognostic Nomogram for the Management of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis in Older Patients.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Deepak Adhikari; Robert A Davee; Gabriela M Vargas; Nina P Tamirisa; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; Santhosh Karri; James R Bundred; Richard P T Evans; Aaron Lin; Tania Kew; Chinenye Ekeozor; Susan L Powell; Pritam Singh; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.