Literature DB >> 8796391

Relationship of changes in cardiac output to changes in heart rate in medical ICU patients.

S A Sasse1, P A Chen, C K Mahutte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in cardiac output are correlated with changes in other commonly measured covariables (heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and temperature).
DESIGN: Case series.
SETTING: Medical intensive care unit (ICU) in a Veterans Administration Medical Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with Swan-Ganz catheters placed by the primary care team were studied on 25 occasions. Patients were managed by the primary team as clinically indicated.
INTERVENTIONS: Thermodilution cardiac output and covariables were determined at baseline and at hourly intervals for the next 5 h. Each cardiac output measurement was calculated by averaging the last four of five individual measurements at each time point.
RESULTS: The mean cardiac output (9.21/min), heart rate (107/min), and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (19 mmHg) were elevated. The hourly mean change in cardiac output was 10.2%. Using least-squares linear regression analysis, we found clinically significant changes in cardiac output (> 6.4%) to be most closely correlated with changes in heart rate (R2 = 0.29, p < 0.001). Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that none of the other covariables added significantly to this relationship. No significant relationship was found between changes in cardiac output and changes in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. Despite these correlations clinically significant changes in cardiac output were accompanied by changes in heart rate in the same direction only 62% of the time.
CONCLUSION: Changes in cardiac output were best correlated with changes in heart rate. Changes in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were not correlated with changes in cardiac output in this population of medical ICU patients. A change in any of the covariables (alone or in combination) cannot be reliably used to indicate a simultaneous change in cardiac output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8796391     DOI: 10.1007/bf01712156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  13 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Relation of mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

Authors:  E D Flores; R A Lange; L D Hillis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Hemodynamic status in critically ill patients with and without acute heart disease.

Authors:  A F Connors; N V Dawson; P K Shaw; H D Montenegro; A R Nara; L Martin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice.

Authors:  C W Stetz; R G Miller; G E Kelly; T A Raffin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-12

5.  Evaluation of right-heart catheterization in the critically ill patient without acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A F Connors; D R McCaffree; B A Gray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Relationship of thermodilution cardiac output to metabolic measurements and mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Authors:  C K Mahutte; M B Jaffe; S A Sasse; P A Chen; R B Berry; C S Sassoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.

Authors:  P R Eisenberg; A S Jaffe; D P Schuster
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Authors:  T Nishikawa; S Dohi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Optimum left heart filling pressure during fluid resuscitation of patients with hypovolemic and septic shock.

Authors:  M I Packman; E C Rackow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness.

Authors:  C C Wo; W C Shoemaker; P L Appel; M H Bishop; H B Kram; E Hardin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  4 in total

1.  Heart rate as an independent risk factor in patients with multiple organ dysfunction: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Robert S Hoke; Ursula Müller-Werdan; Christine Lautenschläger; Karl Werdan; Henning Ebelt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Cardiopulmonary assessment: is improvement needed?

Authors:  Joseph M Van De Water; Martin L Dalton; David C Parish; Robert L Vogel; John C Beatty; Said O Adeniyi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for estimating cardiac index in critically ill patients: the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Geert Koster; Renske Wiersema; Yoran M Hummel; Pim van der Harst; Harold Snieder; Ruben J Eck; Thomas Kaufmann; Thomas W L Scheeren; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Anne Marie G A de Smet; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Clinical examination for diagnosing circulatory shock.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Ruben J Eck; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.