Literature DB >> 8790644

Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database.

M T Cronin1, D A Basketter.   

Abstract

There is a regulatory requirement for the potential of a new chemical to cause skin sensitization to be assessed. This requirement is presently fulfilled by the use of animal tests. In this study a data base of heterogeneous organic compounds from the guinea pig maximization test has been subjected to multivariate QSAR analysis. The compounds were described both by whole molecule parameters and structural features associated with likely sites of reactivity. Principal component analysis was applied to the data set and although it functions reasonably well to reduce the dimensionality of a large data matrix, it is only moderately useful as a predictive tool when descriptors were chosen rationally. Stepwise discriminant analysis produces a fourteen parameter model, of which twelve were structural features associated with reactivity. This however predicts only 82.6% of compounds correctly after cross validation. There is trend for the linear discriminant analysis model to predict compounds as non sensitizers, suggesting that the parameters incorporated were not wholly suitable for discriminating between the two classes. Another criticism of linear discriminant analysis is that it may be unable to cope with the likely embedded data structure. With this in mind, the structural alerts may be better employed in an expert system, to identify potential hazard, where they will not suffer the limitations of a statistical model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8790644     DOI: 10.1080/10629369408029901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  16 in total

1.  4D-fingerprint categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on the classification of local lymph node assay measures.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yufeng J Tseng; Dahua Pan; Jianzhong Liu; Petra S Kern; G Frank Gerberick; Anton J Hopfinger
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Predicting allergic contact dermatitis: a hierarchical structure-activity relationship (SAR) approach to chemical classification using topological and quantum chemical descriptors.

Authors:  Subhash C Basak; Denise Mills; Douglas M Hawkins
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  An evaluation of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting skin sensitisation potential.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; D W Roberts; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and In Silico Predictions.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Lennart T Anger; Romualdo Benigni; David Bower; Frank Bringezu; Kevin M Crofton; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Magdalena Dettwiler; Markus Frericks; Fjodor Melnikov; Scott Miller; David W Roberts; Diana Suarez-Rodriguez; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Elena Lo Piparo; Raymond R Tice; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  Nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin permeation coefficient.

Authors:  Brian J Neely; Sundararajan V Madihally; Robert L Robinson; Khaled A M Gasem
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 8.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: integration of in silico approaches with micro cell culture analogues.

Authors:  A Chen; M L Yarmush; T Maguire
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Haptenation: chemical reactivity and protein binding.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Justin M Hettick; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 10.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.